Solving equation with cube roots.

  • Thread starter Thread starter chingel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation involving cube roots: \(\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2}+\sqrt[3]{x+3}=0\). One participant successfully found a solution, \(x=-2\), by manipulating the equation and factoring. However, confusion arose regarding the transition from \(3x+6=-3\sqrt[3]{x+1}*\sqrt[3]{x+2}*(\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2})\) to \(x+2=\sqrt[3]{(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)}\). Clarification revealed that substituting \(-\sqrt[3]{x+3}\) into the equation allowed for the simplification. The resolution confirmed the validity of the steps taken in solving the equation.
chingel
Messages
307
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement


Solve the equation:

\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2}+\sqrt[3]{x+3}=0


The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was move (x+3)^(1/3) to the other side, cube both sides and when I put them equal to 0 again, I managed to factor (x+2)^(1/3) out of it giving one solution x=-2.

However if I looked up the proposed solution after cubing and a little gathering and grouping it arrived at this:

3x+6=-3\sqrt[3]{x+1}*\sqrt[3]{x+2}*(\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2})

Which is clear, but then in the next step it is converted to this without explanation:

x+2=\sqrt[3]{(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)}

From there on the solution is just putting it equal to 0 and factorizing, but how did it get to this from the previous? It would imply -(\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2}) is equal to \sqrt[3]{(x+3)}, which I don't think it is. Is it wrong or what is up with that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at your original equation:
\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2}+\sqrt[3]{x+3}=0
This means:
\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2}=-\sqrt[3]{x+3}
Plug this into:
3x+6=-3\sqrt[3]{x+1}*\sqrt[3]{x+2}*(\sqrt[3]{x+1}+\sqrt[3]{x+2})
and cancel out a factor of 3 to give:
x+2=\sqrt[3]{(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)}
 
Oh, didn't see that, thank you.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top