Solving First-Order Kinetics for [B] After 7.00 Minutes

  • Thread starter Thread starter geffman1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the concentration of product B after 7 minutes in a first-order reaction A → B, with a rate constant k of 0.30/min and an initial concentration of A at 0.54 M. The user initially misinterprets the calculation, finding the remaining concentration of A to be 0.066 M instead of the desired concentration of B. It is clarified that the question seeks the amount of B produced, not the remaining A. The conversion from A to B indicates that the difference between the initial concentration and the remaining concentration of A gives the concentration of B. The correct concentration of B after 7 minutes is determined to be 0.47 M.
geffman1
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
We examine the reaction A B which displays first-order kinetics. We know that k = 0.30 / min.
If we begin with [A] = 0.54 M what will be after exactly 7.00 minutes?


hey i used the formula In[A]/[Ao]=-kt then rearranged to In[A]=-kt+[InAo]
when i sub it in i get In[A]=-0.3x7+In[0.54] and i get the answer 0.066 however the answer is 0.47M. i tired converting to second and still didnt work. any help would be good. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's nothing wrong with your math.* The amount of [A] left is 0.066. The question is not asking you for the amount of [A] left. It is asking you for the amount of produced.

*Well, other than the fact that it is supposed to be Ln, not In. Natural Logarithm.
 
ta, how do i work out how much is produced?
 
dw, I am stupit. thanks mate
 
A is being converted to B in this chemical reaction, right? If 0.066 is left, what happened to the rest of it? It became B.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top