Solving for Acceleration in a Complex Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheLil'Turkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the acceleration of mass m1 in a frictionless pulley system. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly defining variables and explaining the derivation of equations used in the calculations. There is a consensus that the equations presented may be incorrect, particularly regarding the need for a m1+m2 term in the initial equation. Additionally, the distinction between frictionless pulleys and the absence of friction between the pulley and the rope is highlighted, suggesting that the problem should be approached with the assumption of true frictionlessness. Overall, clarity in the methodology and proper variable definition are crucial for solving the problem accurately.
TheLil'Turkey
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Mecaacutenica%20Teoacuterica_zpsk4q6fegh.png
Mecaacutenica%20Teoacuterica_zpspvblj0ca.png
1. Homework Statement

What is the acceleration of m1? There is no friction so the pulleys don't rotate. The top rope is connected to the ceiling.

Homework Equations


See photo. I think my formula for the acceleration of M2 is only right if m1 = m2 and wrong in all other situations, but I'm not sure what the correct formula is.

The Attempt at a Solution


See photo.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the equation for the acceleration of M2, I forgot to multiply it by g.
I uploaded a more recent photo of my attempted solution. It's in the OP above the original photo.
 
Last edited:
You don't explain the basis for any of your equations, so you need to start at a more basic level. Assign an unknown to each tension and write out the ∑Fi=ma equation for each mass.
By the way, when a pulley is described as frictionless it nearly always means merely that there is no frictional torque at its axis. It does not usually mean there is no friction between the pulley and the rope. (If no friction there then it might as well just be a round mass, no need for it to be a pulley.) Thus, if the pulley has mass and a known radius then you should take into account its moment of inertia. However, if no radius is provided then clearly you have no way to take it into account.
 
There are no radii given. So it's best to assume it's truly frictionless. The problem is difficult enough without friction. If you or anyone else sees any mistakes in my equations I'd appreciate any help you could provide.
 
TheLil'Turkey said:
There are no radii given. So it's best to assume it's truly frictionless. The problem is difficult enough without friction. If you or anyone else sees any mistakes in my equations I'd appreciate any help you could provide.
As I posted, your working is not immediately intelligible because you do not explain how you get any of your equations. Either explain them, or start at a more fundamental level with unknowns for tensions and a ∑F=ma equation for each mass.

You also need to define which way the various acceleration variables are defined. Are they all positive upwards? It doesn't look like it.

For what it's worth, your equations do not smell right to me. I would expect a m1+m2 term in your first equation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top