Solving for Delta: √4x-1 - 3 < .5

  • Thread starter Thread starter afcwestwarrior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta
afcwestwarrior
Messages
453
Reaction score
0
| √4x-1 -3 | < .5 X-2<delta

use graph to find delta, u can draw out the graph which is simple, the 4x-1 is squared, it's just i couldn't fit the square root on it all,

now, the coordinates are 2,3 and 3 goes to 3.5 and 2.5

now here's where i get stuck, what do i do with the absolute value of square root 4x-1, because i plug in 3.5 and 2.5 and subtract those with 2 and there not even close to the answer which is 1.44
 
Physics news on Phys.org
afcwestwarrior said:
| √4x-1 -3 | < .5 X-2<delta

use graph to find delta, u can draw out the graph which is simple, the 4x-1 is squared, it's just i couldn't fit the square root on it all,
You could at least use parentheses! √(4x-1) or just sqrt(4x-1). Is there a reason for use both x and X? Do they represent different values? And for God's sake don't confuse things by saying "squared" when you mean square root!

now, the coordinates are 2,3 and 3 goes to 3.5 and 2.5
This make no sense at all. The coordinates of WHAT are "2,3" (and do you mean (2, 3) so that an x coordinate is 2 and a y coordinate 3)? I can make no sense at all out of "3 goes to 3.5 and 2.5". 3 is a specific number- it can't "go" to anything else.

now here's where i get stuck, what do i do with the absolute value of square root 4x-1, because i plug in 3.5 and 2.5 and subtract those with 2 and there not even close to the answer which is 1.44
Do you mean putting 3.5 and 2.5 equal to X in .5X- 2?

To begin with, if you actually graph y= √(4x-1)-3 and y= .5x- 2, you will see that √(4x-1)-3< .5x- 2 is not true for x around 2, 3, 2.5, or 3.5. Please state the problem exactly as it is given.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top