Solving for Distance d Up Slope of 1/5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lancelot59
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
Lancelot59
Messages
640
Reaction score
1
I'm given that a particle launched at 30 degrees, and 40m/s from the horizontal axis travels a certain distance d up a constant slope of 1/5.

I need to determine how far up that slope the particle goes.

I got a velocity vector the obvious way:

\vec{v}=(40cos(30},40sin(30)-9.8t)

Then integrating to get position:
\vec{r}=(40cos(30)t,40sin(30)t-9.8\frac{t^{2}}{2})

I'm fairly certain I did this bit correctly. The issue I'm having here is that I don't know how to now solve for the arbitrary distance d that the particle travels up the hill.

I was thinking of writing a function for the slope, then seeing where it intersects the parabolic path.
I got y=\frac{1}{5}x for the slope function. However this is in terms of position x and not time. I'm thinking I can use the x position from the parabolic path as the x parameter in the slope function and then solve the resulting equation. Does this make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Lancelot59! :wink:
Lancelot59 said:
… I'm thinking I can use the x position from the parabolic path as the x parameter in the slope function and then solve the resulting equation. Does this make sense?

Yes. :smile:
 
It worked! I was off of the book's answer by 0.1. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top