Solving for Kinetic Energy at Top of Loop-the-Loop

  • Thread starter Thread starter dkgojackets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bead Loop
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of a bead at the top of a loop-the-loop, where the bead exerts an upward force of mg/2 on the track. Participants analyze the forces acting on the bead, noting that the net force must account for both the bead's weight and the upward force it exerts. Initial calculations led to confusion, with some arriving at an incorrect kinetic energy value of mgr/4. However, through clarification, it was established that the total downward force is 3mg/2, resulting in the correct kinetic energy of 3mgr/4 at the top of the loop. The key takeaway is the importance of accurately interpreting the forces involved in the problem.
dkgojackets
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bead slides without friction around a loop-the-loop. The bead is released at height y from the bottom of the loop, which has radius r. What is the instantaneous kinetic energy K at the top of the loop so that the bead would press the track with an upward force F=mg/2?

Express the height y in terms of K, m, and r.

Homework Equations



K=.5mv^2
cent acceleration=(v^2)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a FBD with weight mg down and F mg/2 up. The sum was mg/2 down, which I set equal to m(v^2)/r. I arranged the equation to get v^2=gr/2, and plugged that into the kinetic energy equation, getting mgr/4 as the incorrect solution.

I was able to get the second part through energy conservation, setting mgy=2mgr + K and solving.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. I get mgr/4 = KE at the top as well. We must be missing something.
 
According to the problem, the bead is pressing up. In other words, the bead overcomes its weight to push up on the wire.

According to your analysis, the bead is pressing down. If the bead is pressing up, then the weight force must already be canceled out by some force, with a resulting net force of \frac{mg}{2}. It just so happens, however, that your net force and the actual net force are equivalent. This is just a coincidence.

However, I do not understand why your answer is incorrect, because I am getting the same answer that you did, although with different reasoning. (EDIT: Never mind. See my later post for the error in my reasoning.)
 
Last edited:
So a total force of 3mg/2? That would make kinetic energy 3mgr/4, which seems right.
 
dkgojackets said:
So a total force of 3mg/2? That would make kinetic energy 3mgr/4, which seems right.
The total force is not that.

The problem is asking for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

<br /> KE_i + PE_i = KE_f<br />

Your analysis finds the instantaneous kinetic energy at the bottom of the loop. Now you need to solve for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

Here's the problem - when you found the net force of the bead, you had it going down. It should be going up. The problem tells you that the net force of the bead is upwards. Therefore, centripetal force is equal to mg/2. Your reasoning was slightly incorrect.
 
Saketh said:
The total force is not that.

The problem is asking for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

<br /> KE_i + PE_i = KE_f<br />

Your analysis finds the instantaneous kinetic energy at the bottom of the loop. Now you need to solve for the kinetic energy at the top of the loop.

Here's the problem - when you found the net force of the bead, you had it going down. It should be going up. The problem tells you that the net force of the bead is upwards. Therefore, centripetal force is equal to mg/2. Your reasoning was slightly incorrect.

Not so. The bead is pushing up on the track with a force of mg/2, so the track is pushing down on the bead with a force of mg/2 (Newton 3). This is added to the weight of the bead for a total downward force of 3mg/2, and that is the centripetal force at the top of the loop.

dkgojackets said:
So a total force of 3mg/2? That would make kinetic energy 3mgr/4, which seems right.

That looks right to me.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top