Solving for Parallel Tangent Lines: A Confusing Example

AI Thread Summary
To find the point on the curve y = 1 + 2e^x - 3x where the tangent line is parallel to the line 3x - y = 5, the slope of the line is determined to be 3. The derivative of the curve is calculated as y' = 2e^x - 3. Setting this equal to the slope of the line gives the equation 2e^x - 3 = 3, leading to x = ln(3). The corresponding point on the curve is confirmed to be (ln(3), 7 - 3ln(3)). Graphical representation is suggested for better understanding.
zenity
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm kinda stuck on this question... my text gives me a simple example, but it's far from enlightening. Just wondered if I could get some help!

"At what point on the curve y = 1 + 2e^x - 3x is the tangent line parallel to the line 3x -y =5?"

Would I just need to simply compare the slopes?

I found the derivative of the curve: y'= 2e^x - 3

So I suppose you just set 2e^x = 3... then you get x = ln(3)/2 ?

Thanks~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
parallel means same slope, so u found \frac{dy}{dx} = 2e^x - 3
y=-5+3x, \frac{dy}{dx} = 3
3 = 2e^x - 3
3 = e^x
ln(3) = x
 
Oh, so I had to compute the derivatives for both slopes, then compare them? Interesting... thanks! I have to digest this info now.
 
zenity said:
I'm kinda stuck on this question... my text gives me a simple example, but it's far from enlightening. Just wondered if I could get some help!

"At what point on the curve y = 1 + 2e^x - 3x is the tangent line parallel to the line 3x -y =5?"

Would I just need to simply compare the slopes?

I found the derivative of the curve: y'= 2e^x - 3

So I suppose you just set 2e^x = 3... then you get x = ln(3)/2 ?
-------> Should be -----> 2e^x - 3 = 3 -----------> x = ln(3)
Thanks~
zenity --

Your original approach was CORRECT. You just made the careless error shown above. Method is to determine slope of the line (compute dy/dx of the line OR determine by inspection (like you did) from the line's {y = mx + b} equation that the slope is "3") and then to equate this value to the curve's tangent slope (found by differentiating the curve's equation like you did).

~~
 
so the point would be... ( ln(3), 7-3ln(3) ) ?

I'm just a bit confused graphically.
 
Last edited:
zenity said:
so the point would be... ( ln(3), 7-3ln(3) ) ? <----- CORRECT

I'm just a bit confused graphically.
Your answer is CORRECT. If helpful, sketch the graph to better understand the math. (Or use a graphing calculator.)


~~
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top