Solving for u & A: Help Appreciated!

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivGradCurl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the variables u and A in the equations provided, given specific values for g, h, r, L, and H. It highlights the challenge of having one equation with two unknowns, emphasizing the need to rearrange the equation for t and substitute values to isolate u and A. Participants suggest taking the first derivative of the equation for H with respect to A to find A_max, which can then be used to determine u_min. There are concerns about the accuracy of substitutions and the correctness of the H equation. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the steps needed to solve the problem effectively.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Guys, I'm a little confused. Please, take a look at this:

L=\frac{u\cos A}{r} \left( 1 - e^{-rt} \right)

Solving for t gives

t=\frac{1}{r}\ln \left( \frac{u\cos A}{u\cos A - rL} \right)

Then, substitute t in the equation that follows

H=-\frac{gt}{r}+ \frac{1}{r}\left( u\sin A + \frac{g}{r} \right) \left( 1 - e^{-rt} \right) + h

which gives

H = \frac{g}{r}\ln \left( 1 - \frac{rL}{u\cos A} \right) + \frac{L}{u\cos A} \left( u\sin A + \frac{g}{r} \right) + h

Let's say we're given the values:

g=32

h=3

r=\frac{1}{5}

L=350

H=10

That implies we haven't yet obtained u and A. There is ONE equation and TWO variables. However, we're looking for the u_{min} AND A_{max}. I think we first need to solve the equation above for u, take the first derivative of the expression with the variable A, set it equal to zero, and then solve it for A_{max}. Consequently, we're are able to get u_{min}.

I've had difficulty solving the equation for u. I also tried to solving it with aid of the computer, but it won't give me the answer!

Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, check your substitution. It does not look right to me. Either that or your H equation is wrong to begin with.
 
Last edited:


Hi there,

Thank you for sharing your question and confusion with us. It looks like you are trying to solve for u and A in the equation provided. This can be a bit tricky since there are two variables and only one equation. However, you are on the right track with using the given values to solve for these variables.

To solve for u, you can rearrange the equation for t and substitute the given values to get:

t = 1/5 * ln(u*cosA/(u*cosA - 1750))

Next, substitute this value for t into the equation for H and set it equal to the given value of 10. This will give you an equation with only u and A as variables. You can then use a computer or a graphing calculator to find the values of u and A that satisfy this equation.

As for finding u_min and A_max, you are correct in thinking that you will need to take the first derivative of the equation for H with respect to A and set it equal to 0 to find the maximum value of A. Once you have this value, you can use it to solve for u_min.

I hope this helps. If you are still having difficulty, it may be helpful to discuss the problem with a tutor or teacher who can provide more guidance. Good luck!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top