Solving for v(t), tmax, and Max Height of a Thrown Ball

zeromaxxx
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball is thrown vertically upwards at speed v0. Assume drag force is proportional to v2.

a) Show that, while moving upwards, Newton's Second Law gives a = -g(1+v2/vt2) where vt is the terminal speed.

b) Take v0 = 3vt and solve for v(t), the time tmax at which it reaches max height and the maximum height it reaches. Express your results in terms of g and vt

Homework Equations


a = -g(1+v2/vt2)

v = -vt tanh (t/T), where T = vt/g

y = -vt2/g * ln [cosh (gt/vt)]


The Attempt at a Solution



I got part A of the question simple enough, I'm having trouble with part B. I got the expression for v(t) which was the integral of the first equation. I'm having trouble looking for tmax and the max height. It sounds simple enough but I can't grasp around the idea on how to do it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: what is v at the max height? Think calculus.
 
Last edited:
hotvette said:
What is v at the max height? Think calculus.

v at max height should be 0 right?

so then 0 = -vt tanh (t/T)

It's how to deal with the equation that comes after.

tanh x = (ex - e-x)/(ex + e-x)

tanh (t/T) = (et/T - e-t/T)/(et/T + e-t/T)

0 = -vt[ (et/T - e-t/T)/(et/T + e-t/T)]

so if v = 0, then the the exponential functions on the numerator should equal 1 since -vt(1-1/1+1) = 0. This would be the case if the term (t/T) = 0 cause e0 = 1.

That's the farthest I got since I can't think of anything that can make the term equal zero unless ' t ' itself is zero. I think I'm missing something here.
 
I believe your expression for v(t) is incorrect, since v(0) should be v0.
 
Last edited:
I have the same question on my assignment. I don't get any hyperbolic functions because the object is moving upwards. It would become hyperbolic if it was moving downwards. The integral of 1/(1+x^2) is arctan. So instead of having tanh it would be changed to arctan.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top