Solving for x in Simple Exponential Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter thelannonmonk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation 5(0.10)^x = 4(0.12)^x for x. The original poster graphed the equation and found x to be approximately 1.224, but struggled to replicate this result algebraically. They attempted to use the logarithmic property ln(a^x) = x*ln(a) but faced issues with x disappearing during their calculations. A key point raised was the correct application of logarithms, emphasizing that exponentiation takes precedence over multiplication. Ultimately, the poster acknowledged their mistake in the logarithmic approach and expressed relief after receiving clarification.
thelannonmonk
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
5(0.10)^x = 4(0.12)^x... x = ? getting aggravated

Homework Statement



5(0.10)^x = 4(0.12)^x

this problem is driving me nuts. i graphed it and got x~1.2239011 but I can't find it on paper.

i have been using the property ln(a^x) = x*ln(a)

The Attempt at a Solution



i tried doing x*ln(0.50) = x*ln(0.48)

but i still can't get it. it is making me crazy. i thought i was good at math :(

every time i try to solve it, my x's disappear. i always end up dividing ax/bx and losing them. it is driving me absolutely crazy. is there a different property i should be using? I'm almost positive that all i should need is ln(a^x) = x*ln(a)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
also, I'm not sure if i should be getting 5x*ln(.1) = 4x*ln(.12) -or- x*ln(.5)=x*ln(.48)
 
0.1 = e^a
ln(0.1) = a

5*(0.1)^x = 5*(e^a)^x
 
i don't think you understand my question. i have to solve for x for...

5(0.10)^x = 4(0.12)^x

when i graph 5(0.10)^x and 4(0.12)^x and use the intersection finder, i get x = 1.2239011, which when i plug into the equation yields a correct answer (.29856 = .29856)

but i simply can't find this answer on the paper.
 
In Sec. 3 of the OP, log (5 * 0.10^x) = log 5 + x * log (0.10) NOT log (0.5^x)
Remember, exponentiation takes precedence over simple multiplication.
 
SteamKing said:
In Sec. 3 of the OP, log (5 * 0.10^x) = log 5 + x * log (0.10) NOT log (0.5^x)
Remember, exponentiation takes precedence over simple multiplication.

800px-Picard-facepalm.jpg


ohhh man, that's embarrassing. thanks for your help! should have had that one
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top