Solving for y in a Textbook Problem: Understanding the Next Step | Helpful Tips

powp
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Hello

I am doing this problem in my textbook and I am not sure what is happing in this one step.

2y = 360 \sqrt{\pi} - \sqrt{\pi}y

Trying to solve for y and this is what they show as the next step

(2 + \sqrt{\pi})y = 360 \sqrt{\pi}

Where does this (2 + \sqrt{\pi}) come from?? where did the other y go and the -\sqrt{\pi}?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The (2 + \sqrt{\pi})y came from adding \sqrt{\pi}y to both sides and then factoring out a y from the left hand side. Have you not learned about collecting terms??

2y = 360 \sqrt{\pi} - \sqrt{\pi}y

2y + \sqrt{\pi}y = 360\sqrt{\pi} + \sqrt{\pi}y - \sqrt{\pi}y

(2y + \sqrt{\pi})y = 360\sqrt{\pi}
 
Last edited:
They added \sqrt{\pi}y to both sides.

Now on the left side of the equation we get 2y + \sqrt{\pi}y

and on the right we get 360\sqrt{\pi}

Now on the left side, they factored out the y so you can solve for it.

2y + \sqrt{\pi}y = y(2 + \sqrt{\pi})

Now putting all of this info together we get

(2 + \sqrt{\pi})y = 360 \sqrt{\pi}

and y = \frac{(360 \sqrt{\pi})}{(2 + \sqrt{\pi})}

Jameson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top