Solving Friedmann Equation w/ Friedmann Eqn Hmwk Stmt

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


By substituting in

\left( \frac{\dot{a}}{a_0} \right)^2 = H^2_0 \left(\Omega_0 \frac{a_0}{a} + 1 - \Omega_0 \right)

show that the parametric open solution given by

a(\psi)=a_0 \frac{\Omega_0}{2(1-\Omega_0)}(\cosh{\psi} - 1)

and

t(\psi)=\frac{1}{2H_0} \frac{\Omega_0}{(1 - \Omega_0)^{3/2}}(\sinh{\psi} - \psi)

solve the Friedmann equation.2. The attempt at a solution
I get

\dot{a} = a_0 \frac{\Omega_0}{2(1 - \Omega_0)}(\dot{\psi}\sinh{\psi})

and

\dot{\psi}=\frac{2H_0(1-\Omega_0)^{3/2}}{\Omega_0(\cosh{\psi}-1)}

but I can't get to the first equality. Is this the correct approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may find it easier to write \dot{a} = \frac{\frac{da}{d\psi}}{\frac{dt}{d\psi}}. Dividing by a_0 and squaring should leave you with some expression involving only \psi. A little algebra is then all you need to re-express things in terms of a.
 
I get the right hand side to equal

H^2_0 \frac{2(1-\Omega_0}{\cosh{\psi}-1}

and the LHS

H^2_0 \frac{(1-\Omega_0)\sinh^2{\psi}}{(\cosh{\psi}-1)^2}

but I can't get them equal...
 
I agree with your second expression from computing da/dt, but I think you've made a mistake with your first expression.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top