Solving Frouier Series Problem: Finding Partial Sums for Periodic Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter hazim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
hazim
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Frouier series problem

Lately I took Frouier series...

Homework Statement



Find the Fourier series of the function below which is assumed to have the period 2 \pi, and find the first three partial sums.

http://www.imagehosting.com/out.php/i1650739_untitled.JPG

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I used office 2007 to write my solution...and here they are hosted as a picture..
http://www.imagehosting.com/out.php/i1650792_untitled1.JPG

I see my answer not correct, I hope someone helps me..Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct to integrate from -pi to pi in the integral, but your function is non-zero over that entire interval, so I do not know why you have the function value as 0 in [-\pi , -\pi/2] and [\pi/2 , \pi].

Also I believe your constant in front of your integral for a_n is incorrect. The constant in front of that integral should be:

\frac{2}{Period}=\frac{2}{2\pi}=\frac{1}{\pi}
 
Last edited:
sorry, there is a wrong in the picture of the function...the correction is
-2Pi becomes -Pi; -Pi becomes -Pi/2; Pi becomes P/2; and 2Pi becomes Pi.

so 'GO' the 0's in the integrals you specified becomes right with me..and you are correct about a_n, it should be 1/Pi and the same in the denominator of the cosine in that line..
 
hazim said:
sorry, there is a wrong in the picture of the function...the correction is
-2Pi becomes -Pi; -Pi becomes -Pi/2; Pi becomes P/2; and 2Pi becomes Pi.

so 'GO' the 0's in the integrals you specified becomes right with me..and you are correct about a_n, it should be 1/Pi and the same in the denominator of the cosine in that line..

OK your integration makes sense then.

BTW. I usually imagine my PF name being pronounces "G Zero One." :wink:

So, was the constant your problem or do are you still having trouble?
 
yes it was the constant..it's now solved..thanks
 
Glad to be of help.:smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top