Solving Galilean Transform Homework with Gradients in (u,v)

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkovMarakov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galilean Transform
AI Thread Summary
To express the gradient in terms of the new variables (\vec u, v), the transformation f(\vec x, t) can be rewritten as f(\vec u - \vec a, v - b). The first term, \nabla_\vec x f(\vec x, t), can be transformed using the chain rule, leading to the expression involving \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}. However, the second term, {d^2\vec a\over dt^2}, requires further clarification on how to apply the transformation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the chain rule for both terms in the expression. Understanding these transformations is crucial for solving the homework problem effectively.
MarkovMarakov
Messages
32
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


If there is a change of variables:
(\vec x(t),t)\to (\vec u=\vec x+\vec a(t),\,\,\,v=t+b) where b is a constant.

Suppose I wish to write the following expression in terms of a gradient in (\vec u, v)

\nabla_\vec x f(\vec x,t)+{d^2\vec a\over dt^2} How do I do that?

Homework Equations


Please see above.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first term, I think
f(\vec x, t)\to f(\vec u -\vec a, v-b)
I am not sure what to do with the second term though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should use chain rule I think, so

\frac{\partial }{\partial x}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}

If I understood your question, this is what you are looking for.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top