Solving Gauss Law Question: Q/(πR^4)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a Gauss's Law problem involving a positive charge Q distributed within a spherical volume of radius R, with a charge density that varies linearly with radius. The user attempts to derive the parameter a, concluding that their calculations yield a factor of 3/4 off from the expected result of Q/(πR^4). The error is identified as a misunderstanding of the application of charge density, which is not constant throughout the volume. Additionally, the user presents unrelated questions about electric fields and flux through a cubical box, seeking validation of their solutions. The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying principles of charge distribution in electrostatics.
Crocodile
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi

Im getting a slightly different answer to the one that is needed for the following question:


2) A positive charge Q is distributed throughout a spherical volume of radius R in vacuum.
The charge density rho varies with the radius according to the linear law rho = a r. Show that the parameter a is Q/(pi R^4).


I started by saying that I'm looking at the position where r=R, i.e. at the surface itself. At this point the total charge Q must be present. Hence Q= rho x volume = a x r x volume, and as R=r Q= a x R x volume. Therefore Q = a x r x (4/3)pi R^3, which gives an a similar to the one required, but multiplied by 3/4.

Any ideas where I am going wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q = rho x volume is only correct if rho is constant throughout the volume, which its not. This is just like distance = speed x time is only true if the speed is constant throughout the time.
 
question;Two parallel, uniformly charged, infinitely long wires carry opposite charges with a linear charge density λ = 3.29 μC/m and are 5.35 cm apart. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a point midway between them and 50.3 cm above the plane containing the two wires?

my solution;http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/189/zmsal2.jpg/

question:
The six faces of a cubical box each measure 23.0 cm by 23.0 cm, and the faces are numbered such that faces 1 and 6 are opposite to each other, as are faces 2 and 5, and faces 3 and 4. The flux through each face is:

Face Flux (N m2/C)
1 -194
2 -107
3 -251
4 -500
5 -312
6 -268
Find the net charge inside the cube.

my solution:http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/694/zmsal3.jpg/

can you check my solutıon please,ı thınk somethıng ıs wrong about my answers...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top