Solving Geometric Puzzles: Prisms & Balloons, Polygons & Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter sebassen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polygons
AI Thread Summary
Attaching prisms to a balloon can limit inflation if the prisms are designed to create a rigid structure as the balloon expands. The discussion highlights that hexagonal prisms tessellate effectively, which may influence their arrangement and expansion capabilities. Additionally, the "polygonal granoblastic texture" of certain grounds results in lower superficial tension due to their structural integrity and meaningful tension distribution. The conversation also clarifies that while basalt columns often appear hexagonal, their shapes can vary significantly, and the average number of sides is six. Understanding these geometric principles can provide insights into the behavior of materials under tension and inflation.
sebassen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I've been thinking about these questions and would like to know if you can come up with their answers:

1. if you attach prisms to a balloon and inflate it, will the prisms make it impossible to keep inflating it at some time? Talking about "formulas", why?

2. why do grounds made with prisms ("polygonal granoblastic texture") have less superficial tension than any other ground?

Thx a lot,

Sebassen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. depends on the prisms and how they are attached.
2. because they have more meaningful tensions and, being quite serious structures, cannot be bothered with anything superficial. The resulting coffee is no help.
... this is why you need to provide a context for your questions.
 
1. the prisms have hexagonal base and are glued to the balloon. Then, as you inflate the balloon, they assemble.
2. xD
I'm trying to understand basalt columns, whether they are hexagonal for allowing expansion or whaat
 
Well hexagons tessellate to a flat surface.
Can you provide an example?

Of course if you inflate a balloon inside a structure designed to become rigid at some point in the inflation then of course that would restrict the amount the balloon can inflate. Like I could cover it in interlocking steel plates.

"Superficial tension" would be surface tension to everyone else right?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/surten.html

Basalt column like at Giant's Causway are not predominantly hexagonal - go look at some. The mean number of sides is, indeed, six - but when you look at them and walk over them the "hexagonalness" is not particularly striking.
[see: D. Weaire and N. Rivier. Contemporary Physics 25 1 (1984), pp. 55-99]

More accessible discussion:
http://giantcrystals.strahlen.org/europe/basalt.htm
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top