Solving Griffiths 4.10: Calculating V(r) Using Equation 4.13

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffiths
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Griffiths 4.10

Homework Statement


This question refers to Griffths E and M book.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


part a was easy.
For part b, I am trying to calculate V(r) using equation 4.13 and I am facing an absurdly difficult integration which means I must be doing something wrong.
V(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\left(\int_0^{2\pi} \int_p^{\pi}\frac{\sigma_b}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r&#039;}|}R^2 \sin \theta&#039; d\theta&#039; d\phi&#039; + \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} \int_0^R \frac{\rho_b}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r&#039;}|}r&#039;^2 \sin \theta&#039; dr&#039; d\theta&#039; d\phi&#039; \right)<br />
It is those denominators that are going to kill me!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement


This question refers to Griffths E and M book.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


part a was easy.
For part b, I am trying to calculate V(r) using equation 4.13 and I am facing an absurdly difficult integration which means I must be doing something wrong.
V(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\left(\int_0^{2\pi} \int_p^{\pi}\frac{\sigma_b}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r&#039;}|}R^2 \sin \theta&#039; d\theta&#039; d\phi&#039; + \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} \int_0^R \frac{\rho_b}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r&#039;}|}r&#039;^2 \sin \theta&#039; dr&#039; d\theta&#039; d\phi&#039; \right)<br />
It is those denominators that are going to kill me!
Have you tried using eq 3.94?
The sigma_b and rho_b are not complicated right? So it should not be too hard.
 
I don't see how inserting an infinite series into the integral will make it simpler. I don't see any way to make 3.94 not an infinite series in this case.

Yes sigma_b and rho_b are not complicated.
 
ehrenfest said:
I don't see how inserting an infinite series into the integral will make it simpler. I don't see any way to make 3.94 not an infinite series in this case.

Yes sigma_b and rho_b are not complicated.

The point of using the infinite series is that you can then use the orthonormality of the polynomials to do all the angular integrations trivially! Have you used 3.94 in an actual calculation? That's very powerful. What are sigma_b and rho_b?
 
\rho_b = -2k/r
and
\sigma_b = Rk

In equation 3.94 \theta&#039; is the angle between r and r', not the zenith angle.
 
Never mind. I got it. kdv, there is a much easier way to do it than to use eqn 3.94. BTW the bound charges I gave are wrong.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top