Solving heat equation BACK in time

Curl
Messages
756
Reaction score
0
I want to solve the one-dimensional heat PDE backward in time ∂u/∂t = -∇2u = -∂2u/∂x2 , x element of [0,L]

Basically, I want to find what the initial temperature profile u(x,t=0) should be such that after some time t1 of diffusion, I am left with the bar at a uniform temperature u(x,t1)=c for c>0 and boundary conditions are convective, i.e. ∂u(L,t)/∂x = -h*u(L,t)

I am having trouble doing this numerically using finite difference in MATLAB, and I realize this is an ill-posed problem. But it seems to be pretty simple so it should be possible. Is there some trick to solving this, or would I have to resort to a brute-force method of guess/check?

I'd appreciate some insight. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It could help to draw a vector field and see if there is a way back. But I assume that it is not unique.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top