Solving Impulse: Why Only 1 Method Works for Determining Change in Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the impulse given to a ball by the floor after it is dropped and rebounds. The initial attempt used conservation of energy to find the change in velocity, but this approach failed because mechanical energy is not conserved during the collision, as some energy is converted to thermal energy. The correct method involves using kinematic equations to determine the velocity just before impact and the velocity at the rebound height. The key takeaway is that in problems involving time and collisions, it's essential to use a combination of kinematics, conservation of energy, and momentum principles. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving mechanics problems effectively.
Nito
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nvm, there's no kinetic energy when it reaches its peak height. stupid lol!
 
Nito said:

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?

Because mechanical energy is not conserved in this collision. Part of the mechanical energy is converted to thermal energy (heat) in the collision, with the temperature of the ball and the temperature of the ground increasing slightly.
 
Nito said:

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?

Like chester said, the ball started off with a certain amount of potential energy mg(1.25) and then ended with mg(0.96). So you would have appeared to "lose" energy.

Often if time is involved in a problem, it will be difficult to use the conservation of mechanical energy alone to solve that problem. If you can use kinematics, cons. of E, and cons. of momentum, you are good on a significant number of mechanics problems. And being able to draw free body diagrams...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top