Solving Int. sin(9x)sin(16x)dx w/o Multiple Angles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding an alternative method to solve the integral of sin(9x)sin(16x) without using the multiple angles formula. Participants suggest using the exponential form of sine and the identity sin(α)sin(β) = (cos(α - β) - cos(α + β))/2. One contributor claims that their method simplifies the process, allowing for an easier calculation of the integral. They assert that their approach leads directly to the answer, which is 1/14 sin(7x) - 1/50 sin(25x). The conversation emphasizes the desire for simpler techniques to avoid memorizing complex formulas.
ProBasket
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
\int sin(9x)sin(16x)dx

is there another way of solving the problem above besides using the multiple angles formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use this identity:

<br /> sin u = \frac{e^{iu}-e^{-iu}}{2i}<br />

edit:
expand the sine in term of exponential, multiply them and regroup them into 2 cosine, then do the integral
 
Last edited:
wow looks more difficult than using multiple angles formula. i just thought there's an easier way to do it so i won't have to remeber crazy amount of formulas when it's test day.
 
ProBasket said:
\int sin(9x)sin(16x)dx

is there another way of solving the problem above besides using the multiple angles formula?

use

\sin{\alpha}\sin{\beta} = \frac{\cos(\alpha-\beta) - \cos(\alpha + \beta)}{2}

ehild
 
actually, my way is much much much more easier than remember you formulas...
I can eye ball the answer using my way...
the answer is...
1/14 sin7x - 1/50 sin25x
the expansion of the complex number is easy... there are only 4 terms
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top