Solving Kirchoff's Rules for R1=10 Ohms, R2=15 Ohms, R3=5 Ohms

  • Thread starter Thread starter wazzup
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a circuit problem using Kirchhoff's rules with given resistor values. The user presents their calculations for the currents I1, I2, and I3, arriving at values of 0.273A, 0.218A, and -0.055A, respectively. Other participants confirm the correctness of the equations and suggest verifying the algebra by substituting the calculated currents back into the original equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate initial equations and algebraic manipulation. Overall, the user expresses gratitude for the feedback received.
wazzup
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Q) Given R1=10 Ohms, R2=15 Ohms, R3=5 Ohms, find the current going through each resistor in this pathway in the attached circuit diagram.

My solution is as follows.. i'd appreciate it if you guys could verify if its correct or not:

I2=I1+I3-------------------------Equation 1

Starting from a and going through loop agdf:

-E1+I2R2+I1R1=0
15I2+10I1=6 -----------------Equation 2

Starting from k and going through loop kmdl:

-I3R3-I2R2+E2=0
-5I3-15I2=-3--------------------Equation 3

Plugging Equation 1 into Equation 2

15I2+10(I2-I3)=6
25I2-10I3=6--------------------Equation 4

Adding Equation 3 and Equation 4

25I2 - 10I3= 6
-15I2 - 5I3=-3

By multiplying equation 4 by 2 and then subtracting both, I get:

55I2=12
I2= .218A

Plugging this value of I2 into Equation 4:

25I2-10I3=6
25(.218) - 10I3=6
-10I3=.55
I3= -0.055A

Plugging I2 and I3 into Equation 1

I2=I1+I3
I1=I2-I3
I1= (.218A)-(-0.055A) = .273A

Therefore, I1= 0.273A
I2= 0.218A
I3= -0.055A

Thanks much.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.JPG
    circuit.JPG
    7.4 KB · Views: 446
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations seem correct to me. I didn't solve them, but that shouldn't be a problem.
 
I got this answer wrong on a test for some reason. Could anyone confirm that they got the same answers ( in case I messed up on the algebra,etc )?

Thanks
 
Looks good to me. And well organized to boot! :biggrin:

-Dan
 
wazzup said:
I got this answer wrong on a test for some reason. Could anyone confirm that they got the same answers ( in case I messed up on the algebra,etc )?

Thanks

You know, you can always check your algebra by simply plugging back your values of current in the initial equations. If they work (within a certain precision) then you know you did not mess up the algebra.
The only other way to go wrong is in writing the initial equations in the first place.

Patrick
 
Thanks much guys.. Appreciate it :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top