Solving Laplacian Equation Analytically

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harmony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplacian
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the 2D steady state heat equation analytically, specifically focusing on the Laplacian equation in a square domain with specified boundary conditions. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to proceed after proposing a product solution for the temperature distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of separation of variables and the implications of boundary conditions on the proposed solution. There is a focus on the challenge of determining the correct forms of the functions involved and how to apply the boundary conditions effectively.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the separation of variables technique, with some participants suggesting steps to take after proposing a solution. However, there remains a lack of consensus on how to handle the multiple combinations of functions and the application of boundary conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the various possible combinations of functions and the need to clarify how to utilize boundary conditions in the context of the problem.

Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I wish to solve a 2D steady state heat equation analytically. The boundary is a square. The top side is maintained at 100 C, while the other sides are maintained at 0 C.

The differential equation governing the temperature distribution will be the laplacian equation. To solve the equation analytically, I suppose we can guess that the solution is the product of the two independent variable. But how can I proceed from there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plug your proposed solution in and then separate variables. You'll find one side depends only on one variable, and the other side depends on the other. The only way the equation can work is if both sides equal some constant.
 
Yes, I read about that. But the problem is, there are so many possible combinations (different products of function y and function x), and how should i use the boundary condition to find the one I need?
 
How about writing the steady-state heat conduction equation.

Then the proposed solution, e.g., Q(x,y) = X(x)Y(y), where Q(x,y) is the function one is trying to determine.

Then right the boundary conditions, Q(0,y) = X(0) Y(y) = . . . .
 
Harmony said:
Yes, I read about that. But the problem is, there are so many possible combinations (different products of function y and function x), and how should i use the boundary condition to find the one I need?
You don't choose the specific functions beforehand, if that's what you're confused about. After you separate the variables, you'll have two differential equations. You solve those to find the actual forms of X(x) and Y(y), and then apply the boundary conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K