MHB Solving Linear Transformations in R2: Step by Step Guide

Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

Could anyone give me a step by step method on how to solve these type of questions please? Very confused and need to know for my exams.

Let V denote the real vector space R2 and phi: V -> V be a real linear transformation such that phi((1,0)) = (4,5) and phi((0,1)) = (9,11). Express the imagine phi((x,y)) of (x,y) in terms of x and y.

Assume that w1 = (3,5) and w2 = (10,17) form an ordered basis B for V. Working from the definition determine the matrix M(subscript and superscript B) (phi) of phi with respect to the basis B.

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Using that $\phi$ is a linear map:
$$\phi(x,y)=\phi[x(1,0)+y(0,1)]=x\phi (1,0)+y\phi(0,1)\\=x(4,5)+y(9,11)=(4x+9y,5x+11y)$$
On the other hand:
$$\phi(w_1)=\phi (3,5)=(4\cdot 3+9\cdot 5,\;5\cdot 3+11\cdot 5)=(57,70)$$
Now, write $\phi(w_1)=(57,70)=\alpha_1w_1+\alpha_2 w_2$ and you'll easily find $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ by means of a simple system. In a similar way, you'll get $\phi(w_2)=\beta_1w_1+\beta_2 w_2$. Then,
$$M_B^B= \begin{bmatrix}{\alpha_1}&{\beta_1}\\{\alpha_2}&{ \beta_2}\end{bmatrix}=\ldots$$
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top