Solving Momentum vs Energy Problem: Distance of Clay Parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter derfrok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving two lumps of clay, one thrown and the other suspended, that collide and stick together. Participants question why the problem is framed as an energy issue rather than a momentum one, noting the confusion around the setup. It is clarified that conservation of momentum applies during the collision, while conservation of energy is relevant immediately after, as kinetic energy transforms into potential energy. The transformation occurs because, post-collision, the combined mass of the clay rises, converting kinetic energy into gravitational potential energy. Understanding this transition is key to solving the problem effectively.
derfrok
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
okay, in class my teacher explained to us a problem where he threw up two lumps of clay into the air where the 2nd one was suspended in mid-air and the 1st one was thrown up into it. They collided and stuck to each other. He wanted us to figure out the distance the two parts of clay traveled.

Okay, the question is really this.. How come it's a Energy Problem rather than a Momentum problem? TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can you post the whole question up? this description is abit brief...
 
The problem makes not a whole lot of sense! Two lumps of clay were thrown in the air? Then how was one "suspended" in mid-air? Were they thrown directly up or at an angle? Exactly what distance are you talking about?
 
I recognize this question because it seems to be in every textbook.
(One ball of clay is help by a thread or something)

It does require analysis of both energy and momentum:

in short, you use the conservation of momentum to analyze all problems that feature collisions. Immediately after the collision (the first infinitesimal moment of time)it becomes a conservation of energy problem where the kinetic energy transforms into potential energy.
 
yup that's it.. can you ellaborate more on why after the collision the KE becomes PE in this case? TIA
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top