Solving Moving Crests Problem: Acceleration Zero @ .75m

  • Thread starter Thread starter imranq
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the point on a vibrating string where the crest has zero acceleration. The original poster calculated this point to be at 0.75m, assuming a sine wave model, but expressed confusion regarding the nature of the wave and the meaning of "two periods." Participants noted that a crest typically moves with a steady velocity, implying no acceleration, and raised questions about whether the wave is stationary or progressive. Clarification on the question's wording and context is needed, as the distinction between standing and progressive waves is crucial for solving the problem accurately. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in understanding wave motion and acceleration.
imranq
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A crest is created on a string by vibrating it. The crests have two periods on the string which is 3 m long. At what point will the crest have an acceleration of zero?

I had gotten this problem from a science competition and really had no idea how to do it. But I assumed that the vibrations would make a sine curve and the place where acceleration is zero would be where \frac {d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \sin {x} = 0

Thereby I calculated an answer of .75m, but could someone clarify this for me?

Homework Statement

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


.75m
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see that there is a sensible answer to this question. The 'crest' of a wave usually moves forward at a steady velocity. This implies no acceleration. Perhaps the question refers to a stationary wave. The crest then never moves!
How a crest has two periods does not make sense to me either. Does this mean there are two crest on the string (stationary wave) or one crest takes two time periods to traverse the string(progressive wave)
Alternatively you could consider the acceleration back to the equilibrium position ie from the crest down to the mid line. But a crest is the point of max acceleration by definition.
 
I think when they mention 'crest' they mean to imagine a very small amount of string that is moving in a crest and that obviously accelerates and decelerates depending on how the crest is created. That was my logic, or else I couldn't solve it.
 
Ok If we concentrate on one piece of the string then it is in simple harmonic motion.

The equation for this is a=-Amplitude*(2*pi*freq.)^2*sin[(2*pi*freq.)t]
a= acceleration
amplitude = max distance moved from mid point
freq= number of oscillations per second

But this does not seem to get a solution any closer. There are too many unknowns.

I'm still unclear as to whether they mean a standing wave like the vibration of a guitar string or a progressive wave that moves along the string.

Have you got the precise wording of the question correct?
 
Its hazy right now, maybe the question had a different wording, but I can't check right now
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top