Solving Orbital Radius Problem: Reduce Radius by 1.09 km

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbot2222
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving an astronaut in a space shuttle trying to catch up to a satellite by reducing their orbital radius by 1.09 km. Participants suggest equating gravitational force with centripetal force to determine angular velocity, noting that both the shuttle and satellite share the same angular velocity. The difference in speed due to the radius change is crucial for calculating the time it will take to reach the satellite. One user expresses confusion over their calculations and seeks clarification on the numerical values obtained by others. The conversation highlights the complexities of orbital mechanics and the importance of accurate calculations in such scenarios.
jbot2222
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
im not getting this problem AT ALL:

You are an astronaut in the space shuttle pursuing a satellite in need of repair. You find yourself in a circular orbit of the same radius as the satellite, but 30.7 km behind it. How long will it take to reach the satellite if you reduce your orbital radius by 1.09 km? You can assume the space shuttle has an orbit of 200 miles above the Earth's surface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jbot2222 said:
im not getting this problem AT ALL:

You are an astronaut in the space shuttle pursuing a satellite in need of repair. You find yourself in a circular orbit of the same radius as the satellite, but 30.7 km behind it. How long will it take to reach the satellite if you reduce your orbital radius by 1.09 km? You can assume the space shuttle has an orbit of 200 miles above the Earth's surface.

Equate the gravitational force with the centripetal one and from there u should be able to find the angular velocity.
The speed difference between the shuttle and the satellite will result simply from the fact that both the shuttle and the satellite would move with the same angular velocity.
With the distance and the difference in speed,u should be able to find the time.

Daniel.
 
i tried it, but I am getting the wrong answer. wat numerical value did u get when u did it?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top