Solving Orthogonal Matrix Homework w/ Symmetric Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter beetle2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Orthogonal
beetle2
Messages
110
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the symmetric Matrix

1 2
2 5

find an orthogonal matrix P such that C=BAB^t


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I found the eigenvalues to be 3-(2\sqrt{2}) and 3+(2\sqrt{2})

giving eigenvectors of
<br /> [1,1-\sqrt{2}] and [1,1+\sqrt{2}]

As the dot product of these vectors is 0 they are orthogonal.

do I just normalise each vector and use them as the column vectors of P?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's going to be very difficult to make a statement about C=BAB^t in general. Knowing a symmetric matrix P, associated with an unlabeled matrix does very little to help.
 
Sorry the matrix is

A =

1 2
2 5

find an orthogonal matrix P such that C=PAP^t where C is diagonal

regards
 
Then find the eigenvectors of A. P will be an orthogonal matrix with the eigenvectors of A as rows.
 
So I multiply P =
<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 1-\sqrt{2} \\<br /> 1 &amp; 1+\sqrt{2} \\<br /> \end{array} \right)\] <br />
by A =
<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 2 \\<br /> 2 &amp; 5 \\<br /> \end{array} \right)\] <br />
and PT =
<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1-\sqrt{2} &amp; 1+\sqrt{2} \\<br /> \end{array} \right)\] <br />

which gives C =

<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 20-14\sqrt{2} &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 14\sqrt{2}+20 \\<br /> \end{array} \right)\] <br />


Is this right? I know that C is diagonal but isn't it supposed to have the eigenvalues on the main diagonal?
regards
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top