Solving Physics Problem: Calculating Net Stretch for 55.3kg Person

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninjagowoowoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net stretch of a fire net when a 55.3 kg person jumps from a height of 21.9 m. The initial approach involved using conservation of energy to determine the velocity before impact and subsequently the net's force and spring constant. However, it was pointed out that the gravitational potential energy difference during the fall, including the net's stretch, was not adequately considered. The correct formula incorporates both the fall height and the additional stretch of the net, emphasizing the conversion of gravitational potential energy into spring energy. The key takeaway is the importance of accounting for all energy transformations in such calculations.
ninjagowoowoo
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Q:
A 55.3 kg person jumps from a window to a fire net 21.9 m below, which stretches the net 1.04 m. Assume that the net behaves like a simple spring, and calculate how much it would stretch if the same person were lying in it.

Here's what I did:

using conservation of energy to get the velocity of the person right before it hits the net. (mgh = 0.5mv^2) Once I got the velocity, I found the acceleration caused by the net (deceleration if you will) (v^2=v^2 + 2ay). Then using that acceleration, I found the force of the net on the person (F=ma) Once I found that force, I used it to find the spring constant(k) of the "spring". (F=ky). Finally, using that k, I found the displacement of the "spring" caused by the force of just the person's weight (F=kx where F=55.3kg(9.8)) and got an answer, which was wrong.

Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot to take into consideration the gravitational potential energy difference while the person was on the trampolin.

So,

\frac{kx^2}{2}=mg(h+x)
 
hmm I don't quite understand the formula you came up with. I understand what you are saying, but perhaps you could elaborate a little more on how you came up with that formula. Thanks.
 
oh by the way, thanks for the help.
 
Law of conservation of energy. The gravitational potential energy is converted into the energy of the spring.

E=\frac{kx^2}{2}

The person doesn't only fall 21.9 m, he also falls for an additional 1.04 m while he's streching the trampoline.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top