Solving Potential Energy: Force & Potential Exam Ques.

  • Thread starter Thread starter thenewbosco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a sample exam question involving a force defined as F=-c(x-y)^2(î-ĵ). Participants confirm that the force can be shown to be conservative by calculating its curl. The challenge arises in deriving the potential energy function V(x,y) from the force, with the suggestion that using the negative gradient might not yield the correct potential. It is noted that understanding the relationship between work done against a conservative field and potential energy is crucial. The conversation emphasizes the importance of knowing how to derive potential functions from forces for a deeper grasp of the topic.
thenewbosco
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Just studying for an exam and the following question appeared on the sample exam:
Given the force: F=-c(x-y)^2(\hat{i}-\hat{j}) where i and j are the unit vectors.
a) Show the force is conservative
b) Show the potential energy is given by V(x,y) = \frac{c}{3(x-y)^3)} assuming V(0,0) =0.


So for a) it is simple to show using the curl of F. but for b i am not sure how to get the potential energy function given the force. F=-\nabla V will give the force easily if i have the potential function, but I am not sure how to go the other direction. perhaps for the exam to show it i could just take the negative gradient, (which appears to be wrong for the potential given in this question) but i would like to just know how to go the other way for knowledge. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
if a field is conservative, then the work done against the field on a object from point a to point b is conserved and equals to the change in potential. Well, basically, if you know the work done alone a path, you know the potential function.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top