Solving Problem 2-8: Relative Velocity and Time Elapses

JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
I think I'm thinking to hard for this one, so I'll wait till tomorrow before checking up with you guys. I'll let my brain freshen up first. Yes, I have a "thing" for figuring it out on my own.

Anyways, it's a question from David Hogg's book, so it is NOT my homework.

Problem 2-8

Two spaceships, each measuring 100 m in its own rest frame, pass by each other traveling in opposite directions. Instruments on board spaceship A determine that the front of spaceship B requires 5x10^-6 s to traverse the full length of A.

a) What is the relative velocity of the two spaceships?
b)How much time elapses on a clock from spaceship B as it traverses the full length of A?

Now, that I typed it out, I believe I got it now, so I'll check it out later, and see you guys in 12 hours.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) In the frame of A, synchronized clocks can be setup at the front and back ends of A's spaceship. Hence the speed that A measures for B is determined simply by distance / time.
b) The spaceships are symmetrical. What exactly does the phrase "traversing the full length of A" - the time it takes for the entire ship to pass by one stationary point (eg. the front) in the frame of B?
 
I thought the same for a).

Question b) What would the time be in B's Frame. B wouldn't measure 100m because of length contraction.

If we are right about a), than v is:

100m/5.0*10^-6 = 20,000,000m/s

To find out how much time went by for spaceship B, we use the time dilation(pythagorean) formula.

\gamma \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}

If I did the calculations right, for every second that passes on B, 1.00223 seconds passes on A, relative to A.

This doesn't seem like it is the answer. The question isn't clear enough.

The above question are the EXACT words out of the book, so questions relating to what does "this" actually mean I do not know anything. This is where I think too deep, and I'm sure some of you get the same problem.

I'll move on, and if something comes up, I'll try it.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top