Solving Projectile Problem for Avalanche Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter veloix
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the projectile problem involving a cannon firing at an avalanche, the cannon's muzzle speed is 992 m/s, with a target 1900 m horizontally and 793 m vertically above. The equations of motion are set up using horizontal and vertical components, leading to the equations Xf = xi + vit and Yf = yi + vit + 1/2at². The attempt to solve for time t using the horizontal equation results in a complex expression when substituted into the vertical equation, causing confusion in arithmetic. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in units, as mixing position and speed leads to errors in calculations. The challenge lies in correctly manipulating the equations to find the optimal firing angle.
veloix
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cannon with a muzzle speed of 992 m/s is used to start an avalanche on a mountain slope. The target is 1900 m from the cannon horizontally and 793 m above the cannon. At what angle, above the horizontal, should the cannon be fired? (Ignore air resistance.)

Homework Equations



Xf= xi+vit
Yf=yi+vit+1/2at2
vfy^2=viy^2+2a(yf-yi)
x=cos(theta)992m/s
Y=sin(theta)992m/s

The Attempt at a Solution


ok this one i can get all the equations setup.
xf= cos(theta)992m/s
793=(sin(theta)992m/s)t + 1/2(-9.80)t2
using the x eqaution i can solve for t.
t=1900/cos(theata)992m/s
but once i place it into the eqaution, it gets very messy and i get stuck on the arithmatic.
793= (sin(theta)992m/s)(1900/cos(theata)992m/s)+1/2(-9.80)(1900/cos(theata)992)^2
this is where i am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
veloix said:
xf= cos(theta)992m/s
You have a position measured in meters per second. This obviously doesn't make sense.
 
Avodyne said:
You have a position measured in meters per second. This obviously doesn't make sense.

i know the it shuold look like this
xf=xi+vit
1900m= 0+(cos(theta)(992m/s)t
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top