Solving QM Griffiths 2.28: Transmission Coefficient

  • Thread starter Thread starter genxhis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Griffiths
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a quantum mechanics problem regarding the transmission coefficient for a wave packet encountering Dirac delta wells. The solution involves dividing the space into three regions and applying boundary conditions to reduce the number of unknowns. The derived transmission coefficient is expressed in terms of beta, which relates to the strength of the potential wells. Participants express a desire for validation of the solution, acknowledging the complexity and tediousness of the calculations involved. Ultimately, the process of reviewing the solution aids in understanding the problem better.
genxhis
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
The problem asks for the transmission coefficient for a wave packet with energy approximately E passing through a potential function with dirac delta wells of strength alpha at x = -a and x = +a. To solve the problem I split the region into the three obvious intervals [-inf, -a], [-a, a], and [a, +inf]. For the first two regions I expressed the solutions as (A or C) exp(i k x) + (B or D) exp(-i k x) and for the last as E exp(i k x) where k = sqrt(2 m E)/hbar. I then applied the two contraints at the two boundary conditions to reduce the five unknowns to just one. Finally I did some more algebra to find the trasmission coefficient as the square of (E/A). But the entire process was lengthy and tedious. I was wondering if someone could validate this answer:

T = \frac{1}{1 + 2 \beta^2[ (1+\beta^2) + (1-\beta^2)\cos 4ka -2\beta \sin4ka ]}​


where \beta = (m \alpha)/(\hbar k).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no better checking than the one you can do it yourself by making sure your method & calculations were correct.

I think no one around here will do the calculations at this problem,just to agree or disagree with your answer.

Daniel.
 
your right, sorry. i was hoping someone could recognize this as a special case of a more general problem or simply point out that the answer is unviable. but, I've looked it over more carefully, and i think it is. in any case, recapitulating what i did helps me understand it a little better.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top