Solving RC Circuit Problem Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a homework problem related to an RC circuit with a capacitor and resistors. For part (a), the initial charge on the capacitor is calculated based on the voltage across it, which is influenced by the resistors in the circuit rather than the full battery voltage. The participants clarify that after a long time, the capacitor reaches a steady-state voltage determined by the voltage drop across the resistors, not the battery voltage. For part (b), the time for the capacitor's charge to decrease to 10% of its initial value involves using the exponential decay formula related to RC circuits. Understanding the voltage across the capacitor in relation to the circuit configuration is crucial for solving both parts of the problem.
majormaaz
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider the circuit in the figure below, in which V = 85 V, R = 40 , and the switch has been closed for a very long time.

p31-77alt.gif


(a) What's the charge on the capacitor?
(b) The switch is opened at t = 0 s. At what time has the charge on the capacitor decreased to 10% of its initial value?

[Here's the link for the picture if it doesn't come up]
http://www.webassign.net/knight/p31-77alt.gif

Homework Equations


C = Q/V
V = IR
Q = C*EMF*e^(-t/RC)

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a), I thought that since the circuit's been connected like that for a long time, the voltage across the capacitor would be the same as the battery's voltage - i.e. 85 Volts. From there, a simple Q = CV would yield 1.7 e -4 C = 170 μC, but that's not right.

For part (b), I was thinking that since it's a parallel circuit, I'd have to use Kirchoff's Law and the Loop Rule to get those 2 loop equations and the Junction equation, but I'm not sure as to if there's another method to get to the answer.

I would appreciate any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
majormaaz said:

Homework Statement


Consider the circuit in the figure below, in which V = 85 V, R = 40 , and the switch has been closed for a very long time.

p31-77alt.gif


(a) What's the charge on the capacitor?
(b) The switch is opened at t = 0 s. At what time has the charge on the capacitor decreased to 10% of its initial value?

[Here's the link for the picture if it doesn't come up]
http://www.webassign.net/knight/p31-77alt.gif

Homework Equations


C = Q/V
V = IR
Q = C*EMF*e^(-t/RC)

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a), I thought that since the circuit's been connected like that for a long time, the voltage across the capacitor would be the same as the battery's voltage - i.e. 85 Volts. From there, a simple Q = CV would yield 1.7 e -4 C = 170 μC, but that's not right.

For part (b), I was thinking that since it's a parallel circuit, I'd have to use Kirchoff's Law and the Loop Rule to get those 2 loop equations and the Junction equation, but I'm not sure as to if there's another method to get to the answer.

I would appreciate any help!
(The image shows up just fine!)

For part (a):
After a long time, the capacitor is fully charged, so no current flows through it or the 10Ω resistor. So there is 0 voltage drop across the 10Ω resistor.

However, current does flow through the 60Ω and 40Ω (R) resistors. Thus they act as a voltage splitter, and C is in parallel with R .​
 
SammyS said:
However, current does flow through the 60Ω and 40Ω (R) resistors. Thus they act as a voltage splitter, and C is in parallel with R .

I think you're saying that the voltage across C would be the same potential difference as the voltage drop across resistor R. But I don't get how that would work if the capacitor was fully charged - I mean, after a long time, I can see why there'd be no current in that branch, but wouldn't the capacitor have charged up to the voltage of the battery by then (and not the resistor)?
 
Thanks for the help! I did get both answers with your help, but I'd still like to understand why the capacitor would charge up to (I)*40 Ω instead of the full battery voltage.
 
majormaaz said:
I think you're saying that the voltage across C would be the same potential difference as the voltage drop across resistor R. But I don't get how that would work if the capacitor was fully charged - I mean, after a long time, I can see why there'd be no current in that branch, but wouldn't the capacitor have charged up to the voltage of the battery by then (and not the resistor)?

The potential difference across the capacitor cannot go higher than the potential difference available at the nodes where it connects.

To find the steady-state potential that a capacitor will achieve, remove the capacitor from the circuit and find the open-circuit voltage at the open terminals where it was connected.
 
gneill said:
The potential difference across the capacitor cannot go higher than the potential difference available at the nodes where it connects.

To find the steady-state potential that a capacitor will achieve, remove the capacitor from the circuit and find the open-circuit voltage at the open terminals where it was connected.

I will keep this in mind. Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top