Solving River Current Speed: 67m Downstream, 100m Wide

  • Thread starter Thread starter sundrops
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    River
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a river current based on a swimmer's movement across a 100m wide river, ending up 67m downstream. The swimmer's speed in still water is 1.20m/s, but the initial calculations using trigonometric functions to find the current speed were incorrect. A more effective approach involves determining the time taken to cross the river, which can then be used to calculate the current speed based on the downstream drift. The correct method emphasizes separating the swimmer's velocity components to accurately assess the current's impact. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for a clearer understanding of vector components in solving the problem.
sundrops
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
A swimmier heads across a river, swimming at 1.20m/s relative to still water. It arrives at a point 67.0 m downstream from the oint directly across the river, which is 100.m wide. What is the speed of the river current?

Here's what I did:

tan^-1(67/100)
theta = 33.82 degrees

Vx = Vxocos(33.82)
Vx = 1.20m/s * cos(33.82)
Vx = 0.997m/s

and since the current is moving in the opposite direction it would be -0.997m/s.

Does that sound about right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's wrong.

So obviously my method of getting the answer was flawed aswell. Is there another way to solve this problem?
 
Determine the time it takes to cross the river. In this period the swimmer drifts 67 m. Solve for the current speed.
 
sundrops said:
it's wrong.

So obviously my method of getting the answer was flawed aswell. Is there another way to solve this problem?

1.20 m/s is the speed of the swimmer in still water. Not his total speed. His velocity is 1.20 m/s in the x-direction (direction across river), and v in the y-direction(along the river), where v is the river speed. How long does it take him to cross the river?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top