Solving Rotation Question: Find Angular Speed After Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter sicrayan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a physics problem involves a small block colliding with a vertical rod, which is pivoted and initially at rest. The key to solving for the angular speed of the rod after the inelastic collision is using the conservation of angular momentum, not energy, as energy is not conserved in inelastic collisions. Participants emphasize that momentum is conserved while kinetic energy is not, highlighting the distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions. The conversation reinforces the importance of recognizing the type of collision when applying conservation laws. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
sicrayan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the small block is heading towards the uniform vertical rod. the rod is pivoted at its midpoint and is free to rotate without friction.
final.png

the block collides with the rod, which is at rest, and sticks to it at its lower point.
find the angular speed of rod immediately after collision.

Homework Equations


we can use Li=Lf and it will give the right answer.

The Attempt at a Solution


but when i try to use the conservation of energy, it doesn't work.
KEblock=(Rotational KE)rod and block
why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sicrayan said:

The Attempt at a Solution


but when i try to use the conservation of energy, it doesn't work.
KEblock=(Rotational KE)rod and block
why not?

This is an inelastic collision.

In an inelastic collision, momentum is conserved, but energy is not.

If the block had bounced off of the rod, energy could have been conserved (if the collision were perfectly elastic.)
 
welcome to pf!

yup … in a collision exam question, energy is never conserved unless the question says so! :wink:
 
all right, thank you both :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top