Solving Series RLC Circuit Problems: Input/Output Equations & Diagram

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a series RLC circuit problem, specifically focusing on finding the input/output difference equations for various circuit elements such as the resistor, inductor, and capacitor. Participants are seeking assistance with the mathematical formulation and analysis of the circuit based on a provided diagram.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests direct answers for the difference equations related to voltage across the resistor, inductor, and capacitor, as well as the current.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to show work in accordance with forum rules and suggests starting with Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) or Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL).
  • A participant describes their attempt to apply KVL around the loop, leading to an equation that incorporates the voltages across the capacitor, inductor, and resistor.
  • There are multiple attempts to express the voltages and currents in terms of each other, with some participants suggesting substitutions to simplify the equations.
  • One participant advises using the capacitor voltage as the independent variable in series circuits and expresses the current as a function of this voltage.
  • Another participant suggests avoiding integral terms in the equations and instead using the capacitor voltage directly to derive a second-order equation.
  • A later reply introduces a difference equation approach to solve the RLC circuit, providing a specific formula for the charge and subsequent relationships for the voltages across the components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of showing work and following forum rules, but there is no consensus on the specific methods or equations to use for solving the circuit problem. Multiple approaches and suggestions are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion and difficulty in progressing with their solutions, indicating that assumptions about the circuit's behavior and the relationships between variables may not be fully resolved. The discussion includes various mathematical formulations that may depend on specific interpretations of circuit laws.

Raihan
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Please help me to solve this RLC circuit problem. I am completely confused.If you give me the direct answer it would be much appreciated.
For the series RLC circuit in Figure, find the input/output
difference equation for

1.[tex]y(t)=v_{R}[/tex]
2.[tex]Y(t)=i(t)[/tex]
3.[tex]y(t)=v_{L}[/tex]
4.[tex]y(t)=v_{C}[/tex]

I have attached the Circuit diagram in a .jpg file.
 

Attachments

  • RLC circuit.JPG
    RLC circuit.JPG
    7.7 KB · Views: 774
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You must show your own work in order for us to help you (PF homework forum rules). Would KCL or KVL be the best way to start?
 
Hey first I tried taking the KVL around the loop
something like
[tex]-x(t) + v_c(t) + v_L (t) + v_R (t) = 0[/tex]----(1)
replaced v_L(t) with first order Ldi_L(t)/dt and make an equation for
[tex]v_C(t)[/tex]
and then as its in series I tried to write a function for
[tex]i_L(t) = \frac {v_R (t)} R[/tex]------(2)
and for [ tex ] v_R(t)/R=C \frac {dv_c(t)} {dt} [/tex]----(3)
Then tried sub (3) in (1)
and got
[tex]v_C(t) = x(t) - \frac {L} {R} dv_R(t)/dt - v + R(t)[/tex]----(4)
and then tried sub it i eqn 3. and didnt come up with a satisfactory result.
Please help.
Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raihan said:
Hey first I tried taking the KVL around the loop
something like
[tex]-x(t)+v_c(t)+v_L(t)+v_R(t)=0[/tex]----(1)
replaced v_L(t) with first order Ldi_L(t)/dt and make an equation for
[tex]v_C(t)[/tex]
and then as its in series I tried to write a function for
[tex]i_L(t)=v_R(t)/R[/tex]------(2)
and for [tex]v_R(t)/R=Cdv_c(t)/dt[/tex]----(3)
Then tried sub (3) in (1)
and got
[tex]v_C(t)=x(t)-\frac {L} {R}dv_R(t)/dt-v+R(t)[/tex]----(4)
and then tried sub it i eqn 3. and didnt come up with a satisfactory result.
Please help.
Thanks
In series circuits you should always use [tex]v_C[/tex] as the independent variable (and [tex]i_L[/tex] in parallel circuits).
Since the current is the same for all elements, write [tex]v_L[/tex] and [tex]v_R[/tex] as functions of the current. Finally write the current as a function of [tex]v_C[/tex].
 
Thank you very much for your info SGT, would you please help little bit more.
 
Raihan said:
Thank you very much for your info SGT, would you please help little bit more.
Make the substitutions I suggested in your equation 1. More help will only be provided after you show some work.
 
I tried And I am not going anywhere. please help
 
Post what you have done and I will give you more hints.
 
solution so far

heres what I got so far.. please help after this point..
thanks
 

Attachments

  • solution.gif
    solution.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 687
  • #10
In the second equation don't use the integral term. Keep it as [tex]V_C(t)[/tex].
In the two other terms replace i by [tex]C\frac{dV_C}{dt}[/tex]. You get a second order equation in [tex]V_C[/tex]
 
  • #11
Would you please not mind to show me please. I have tried this so far. please help after this.
thanks
 
  • #12
The rules of the forum are that you must do your work. We only give hints. Rewrite the second equation with the suggestions I made and post it here.
 
  • #13
The easiest way to solve any RCL circuit with an input vs(t) is by a difference equation.

Let curr= (q1-q0)/dt


q2=2.*q1-q0 + dt**2*( -q1/(L*c) -(R/L)*curr +vs(t-dt) ).

Then everything else follows ,

Vc(t) = q2/C , VL = L * ( q2-2*q1+q0)/dt^2 , VR = R*(q2-q1)/dt
SEE http://www.geocities.com/serienumerica/RCLfree.doc
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K