Solving SHM of Cube Connected By Rubber Bands

  • Thread starter Thread starter NATURE.M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Rubber Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a cube connected to rubber bands, demonstrating simple harmonic motion (SHM) when displaced. Participants analyze the forces acting on the cube, particularly the tension in the rubber bands and gravitational effects. They explore the differential equation governing the motion and discuss the implications of changing variables to simplify the equation. The consensus is that gravity can be neglected for the problem's context, allowing for a clearer analysis of the oscillatory behavior. Ultimately, the angular frequency of the system is derived, emphasizing the relationship between tension, mass, and the length of the rubber bands.
NATURE.M
Messages
298
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cube of mass m is connected to two rubber bands of length L, each under tension T. The cube is displaced by a small distance y perpendicular to the length of the rubber bands. Assume the tension doesn't change. Show that the system exhibits SHM, and find its angular freqency ω.

The Attempt at a Solution



So basically from a FBD of cube, I have vertical forces: -2Tsinθ - mg = m\frac{d^2y}{dt^2} and the horizontal components of tension from each band cancels. Now since the cube is displaced by a small distance y, I assume we can approximate sinθ ≈ θ. But then I'm not sure what to do?
I tried using sinθ = \frac{y}{(y^2+L^2)^{1/2}}, but then I get a complicated expression.
I know I need to obtain a -constant*y on the LHS. Any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think i got it, your assuming sinθ ≈ y/L, for small y.
One question though, do we have to assume gravity is negligible to get a sensible answer?
 
Last edited:
No, you don't. The differential equation becomes
$$y'' + \frac{2T}{mL}y + g=0.$$ Now consider a change of variables to ##u = y+\frac{mg}{2T}L##. What's the differential equation in terms of ##u##? What does ##\frac{mg}{2T}L## physically represent?
 
vela said:
No, you don't. The differential equation becomes
$$y'' + \frac{2T}{mL}y + g=0.$$ Now consider a change of variables to ##u = y+\frac{mg}{2T}L##. What's the differential equation in terms of ##u##? What does ##\frac{mg}{2T}L## physically represent?

We haven't studied differential equations in much depth (since its a introductory physics course), so I didn't really catch the change of variables part. If you could explain further, I'd appreciate it.
 
I would just throw gravity out. The problem doesn't specifically mention it, so it might as well be on a frictionless tabletop or so.
 
NATURE.M said:
We haven't studied differential equations in much depth (since its a introductory physics course), so I didn't really catch the change of variables part. If you could explain further, I'd appreciate it.
I'm saying rewrite the equation in terms of u instead of y. If you differentiate u twice, you get u''=y'', right? Just substitute in for y and y''.

jackarms said:
I would just throw gravity out. The problem doesn't specifically mention it, so it might as well be on a frictionless tabletop or so.
It would be kind of hard to oscillate vertically on a flat tabletop.
 
vela said:
It would be kind of hard to oscillate vertically on a flat tabletop.
When I read the problem, I also assumed (as jackarms did) that the oscillation was taking place in the horizontal, not the vertical. There is nothing in the problem statement that mentions the vertical. I pictured a horizontal frictionless table.

Chet
 
this is what I came out with...I also went on to show the frequency as well...
 

Attachments

  • shm.jpg
    shm.jpg
    18.6 KB · Views: 489
Ronaldo95163 said:
this is what I came out with...I also went on to show the frequency as well...
This is definitely not what my answer would have been. I would have had T as a parameter in the frequency. I would have had:
f=\frac{1}{2π}\sqrt{\frac{2T}{mL}}
This is based on Vela's equation in post #3, with g removed.

Chet
 
  • #10
That's true. I inferred it from the use of ##y##, but that's not really justified.
 
  • #11
The angular frequency is actually represented by omega...f is the frequency of oscillation
 
  • #12
Ronaldo95163 said:
The angular frequency is actually represented by omega...f is the frequency of oscillation
Yes. ω=2πf

Chet
 
  • #13
Yip so my proof of the angular frequency stops at the third to last line
 
Back
Top