Solving Simultaneous Equations

Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
I need help solving these two equations simultaneously

y = c_1e^{r_1t_o}+c_2e^{r_2t_o}

y' = c_1r_1e^{r_1t_o}+c_2r_2e^{r_2t_o} My plan of solving these two equations is by substitution. By rearranging I obtain the following:

c_1 = [y-c_2e^{r_2t_o}]e^{-r_1t_o}
c_1= \frac{[y' -c_2r_2e^{r_2t_o}]e^{-r_1t_o}}{r_1}

Likewise,

c_2=[y-C_1e^{r_1t_o}]e^{-r_2t_o}
c_2=\frac{[y'-c_1r_1e^{r_1e^r_1t_o}]e^{-r_2t_o}}{r_2}

Don't know what to do from here. :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I don't see how these are two simultaneous equations. It's just the one equation you have for y and then you have its derivative with respect to t0 below it...
 
Marioeden[I said:
;3997417]Sorry, I don't see how these are two simultaneous equations. It's just the one equation you have for y and then you have its derivative with respect to t0 below it...

No, I am are trying to simultaneously solve from equations y & y' for c_1 & c_2. [/I]
 
ah right, you want c1 and c2 in terms of y and y'

So like multiply the first equation by r2 and subtract them, then you'll get c1. Do the same thing but multiply the first equation by r1 instead and subtract them and you'll get c2 :)
 
Edit: Fixing Mistake

Marioeden said:
ah right, you want c1 and c2 in terms of y and y'

So like multiply the first equation by r2 and subtract them, then you'll get c1.

Okay so I get

c_1 = \frac{[y'-yr_2]}{r_2-r_1}e^{-r_1t_o}

The book gets the same answer but with r_1-r_2 in the denominator. Any ideas why? As long as I subtract the first equation from the second, I will always get r_2-r_1.

P.s. I'll solve the other half after I grab some food.
 
Last edited:
You may want to double check your algebra, the book is right...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top