Solving Spaceship Chase Scene Relative Velocity Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter frerelupin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spaceship
frerelupin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have been pondering but cannot quite resolve the following question:

Imagine two spaceships, separated by 4 light-seconds initially. Spaceship A is traveling at 0.8c and Spaceship B (the one with the lead) is traveling at 0.4c.

Clearly an external observer will see this "chase" last for 10 seconds.
Spaceship A determines that the chase lasts ~6 seconds.
Spaceship B determines that the chase lasts ~9.17 seconds.

Calculating their velocities relative to one another is trivial and will be 0.588c and -0.588c.

Here is my conundrum: I want to be able to show that all frames are relative thus doing Einstein a solid. I feel I should be able to do this just using d=vt if I can answer the following question:

How far does Spaceship B appear to travel from A's perspective, and vice versa.

I can't quite get this to work out, but I feel that Spaceship A should see Spaceship B coming at them for 6 seconds at -0.588c, which means they covered 3.53 light-seconds, and that Spaceship B should see Spaceship A coming at them for 9.17 seconds at 0.588c meaning they covered 5.39 light-seconds.

There should be a manner in which I can determine the distance each appeared to travel using length contraction; that is to say, without using the times and velocities as derived above.

Am I off somewhere? Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may be trivial but that is not what I get for their relative velocities. I get
\frac{.8c- .4c}{(1+ .8(.4)}= (.4c)/(1.32)= 0.303c
and -.303c
 
Shouldn't the function in the denominator be subtraction? They are both traveling in the positive direction, so I would think there would be a subtraction in the numerator as well as the denominator.
 
I agree with +/- .588 c relative speed.

However, the problem is you cannot just use length contraction. Like it or not, you must use relativity of simultaneity as well. The initial distance of 4 light seconds is using the 'external' observer's simultaneity. The .8c rocket not only disagrees with the 4 light seconds, but it also disagrees with the external observer as when the .4 rocket was contracted 4 light seconds light seconds away.

The easiest way to work such a problem is to ignore the breakdown into velocity addition, contraction, simultaneity, and just Lorentz transform the whole scenario from 'external' to .8c rockect, then from external to .4 rocket.
 
PAllen: Hmmmm... if I understand what you're saying (and I'm not certain I do!) you mean to say just do the velocity addition anyway? I'm trying to find a way around that part. As I said in my original post, I want to be able to show that v=d/t works in the rest frame, the 0.8c frame, and the 0.4c frame as long as we use the properly framed d and t values.

If you are saying I could do this, could you elaborate on which transforms you are talking about? Do you mean to say use:

\begin{equation}
x'=\frac{x-ut}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
t'=\frac{t-\left(\frac{u}{c^2}\right)x}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}
\end{equation}
 
Woot! PAllen, you the man! Here's what I did:

\begin{equation}
v'=\frac{x'}{t'}=\frac{\frac{x-ut}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}}{\frac{t-\left(\frac{u}{c^2}\right)x}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}}=\frac{x-ut}{t-\frac{ux}{c^2}=0.588c
\end{equation}

Done! Thank you so much! This has been bothering me for a while now.

Cheers!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top