Solving Star Resistor Configuration Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a star resistor configuration problem, where the user initially miscalculates the equivalent resistance due to confusion about the arrangement of resistors. The resistors R1 (18Ω) and R2 (30Ω) are clarified as not being in parallel, prompting a reevaluation of the circuit. The correct approach involves calculating the parallel combination of R4 (12Ω) and R2 instead. The importance of recognizing continuous connections in the circuit is emphasized, aiding in the understanding of resistor configurations. Overall, visualizing the circuit with a real battery helps clarify the connections and calculations needed for accurate results.
Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Hi I am little confused by star resistors configuration. The problem is asking for equivalent resistor for the circuit. I have attached the image below (Image is little sloppy because I can't draw with a mouse :D).

My logic is as follows:

First I calculated R1 and R2 as parallel resistors.

Req1 = (1/R2 + 1/R1)^-1
Req1 = 11.25;

Then I calculated that value in series with 4.5 resistor.

Req2 = 11.25 + 4.5 = 15.75;

Since, Req2 is parrallel with R4 then they should also add reciprocally.

Rt = (1/R4 + 1/Req2)^-1 = 6.81;

This value is wrong though I don't know what I did wrong.

Thanks for help in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.JPG
    Circuit.JPG
    10.5 KB · Views: 411
Physics news on Phys.org
Which resistors are R1 and R2?

ehild
 
Sorry for the confusion I accidently uploaded the image that doesn't contains the name of the each resistor.

Anyway they are as follows:

R1 = 18 OHM
R2 = 30 OHM
R3 = 4.5 OHM
R4 = 12 OHMThanks.
 
The 18Ω and 30Ω resistors are not parallel. Calculate the parallel resultant of the 12Ω and 30Ω ones.

ehild
 
I see but how can I know if they are parallel or not ? If they this star shape ? The way I analyzed this shape is first taking following charge from Positive terminal then when it goes to junction that has R2 and R1 I thought then one charge would go one way while other goes the other way.

Thanks.
 
I believe the equivalent circuit where the way resistors are connected is clearly seen is this one:

http://s14.postimage.org/kr0641tip/equivalent.png
 
I see that makes sense thanks :).
 
Don't let slanted components and wires fool you :smile: If there's an unbroken wired connection between points they all comprise the same node. Feel free to rearrange the drawing so long as the same connections are maintained:

attachment.php?attachmentid=46110&stc=1&d=1334149935.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4.4 KB · Views: 512
I see thanks a lot gneil its easier to draw it in this configuration better than delta configuration. That statement about continuous made me understand the logic a lot because when my book solves questions like this it assumes u already know how to change from configuration to configuration without understanding the process.
 
  • #10
I think it also helps to imagine a real battery connected to it with a real wires and see the situation that comes from these connections. Helped me to think about that way.
 
Back
Top