Solving Subterranean Trains Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trains
Mk
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
4
Problem statement
Very fast trains can travel from one city to another in straight subterranean tunnels. Assume that the density of the Earth is constant so that the acceleration of gravity as a function of the radial distance r from the center of the Earth is g=(GM/R^3)r, where G, M, and R are constants.

1. Show that the component of gravity along the track of the train is gx=-(GM/R^3)x where x is measured from the midpoint of the track.
2. Neglecting friction, show that the motion of the train along the track is simple harmonic motion with a period independent of the length of the track.
T_0 = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{R ^3}{g}}

The first thing that I notice, is that
T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{R ^3}{g}}
looks suspiciously like
T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{\ell}{g}}

And g_x=G\frac{M}{R^3}x looks suspiciously like:

F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}
F=m_1 a_1
a_1= \frac {F}{m_1}
a_1 = G \frac{m_2}{r^2}

And other than that, I'm stuck. I don't even understand what this problem is asking for sure yet. And just because something "looks" like something doesn't mean necessarily it's right, but both of the equations do look quite suspicious! I would be pleased with any hints.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I made a small bit of progress with the pendulum equation similarity idea. I drew a diagram of a sector of a slice of the earth, with radius r, angle theta, and therefore the arc length would be:
s = r \theta

So, by trigonometry, the straight train tunnel/tracks is equal to r \tan \theta

(Unless by "straight" it means curving along with the curve of a perfect sphere in which case it would just be s)

Also, velocity v cold be equated to change in theta, and then also acceleration and so on:
v = {ds\over dt} = \ell{d\theta\over dt}
a = {d^2s\over dt^2} = \ell{d^2\theta\over dt^2}
 
Last edited:
Can someone answer this question please? I am in the same position the OP was at.
 
The 2nd part is straightforward: given the expression for force along x from the 1st part, the equation F = ma boils down to mx'' = -kx where k is given by the answer to the 1st part. This equation represents simple harmonic motion with radian frequency ω = √(k/m) and period = 2π/ω. Rather than trying to fit a pendulum's motion into your problem, concentrate on the math behind the formulas. For one thing, your pendulum formula is an approximation, valid for infinitely small perturbation angles only. The above equation has no such limitation. Which is why the question says "independent of the length of the track".

For the 1st part, come up with an expression that shows the force along x is proportional to the distance x away from the track's low point. This is so because gravity is postulated here to increase linearly with vertical distance away from the Earth's center, and thus also from the track's low point, and x is related to y by simple trig.
 
There have been so many views (> 1500) on this item that it suggests that subterranean trains are a fascinating subject to many.

Here's a question for some of them: given that one wants to construct an underground tunnel between two fixed surface points A and B, what shape should the tunnel take for a frictionless train to go from A to B in minimum time? The distance between A and B is L.

And unlike the OP's problem, consider g constant for the depths involved.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top