What Are Common Errors When Solving Complex Systems of Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a complex system of equations, with participants sharing their struggles and methods. A user expresses frustration over obtaining inconsistent solutions for the equations, indicating potential mistakes in their calculations. They detail their attempts and the various answers they arrived at, highlighting the importance of organized work to avoid errors. Another participant suggests using matrix operations as a more efficient method to solve the system, emphasizing its effectiveness despite initial intimidation. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the challenges in solving such equations and the relief of finding clarity through shared methods.
zeronem
Messages
117
Reaction score
1
I found this System of Equations to be a real pain, I've come up with a lot various answers and some of them have worked, but then when i try it on others, they don't work.

x + 2y = 5
3x +4z = 2
2y + 3w = -2
3z - 2w = 1

Ive tried solving this so many times. I've gotten z = 29/35, x= 323/35, y = -74/35, w = 26/35. They work on some, but then it doesn't work on the x. I've also gotten w = 17/35, x = -22/105, z = 23/35, and y = 547/210. Evidently I'm making some mistakes in some areas of solving this system. Any mistake can cause huge catastrophe in Math. Please help me out here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x + 2y = 5
3x +4z = 2
2y + 3w = -2
3z - 2w = 1

from the 1st equation, x = 5-2y
sub into 2nd equation ...
3(5-2y) + 4z = 2

from 4th equation, w = (3z-1)/2
sub into 3rd equation...
2y + 3[(3z-1)/2] = -2

now you have two equations with y and z as variables...
3(5-2y) + 4z = 2 ... 2y + 3[(3z-1)/2] = -2
15 - 6y + 4z = 2 ... 4y + 3(3z-1) = -4
-6y + 4z = -13 ... 4y + 9z - 3 = -4
... 4y + 9z = -1

4(-6y + 4z = -13)
6(4y + 9z = -1)

-24y + 16z = -52
24y + 54z = -6
-----------------
70z = -58
z = -58/70 = -29/35

3z - 2w = 1
-87/35 - 2w = 1
w = -61/35

3x + 4z = 2
3x - 116/35 = 2
x = 62/35

x + 2y = 5
62/35 + 2y = 5
2y = 5 - 62/35
y = 113/70

The person that made up this system was definitely a numerical sadist...some ugly solutions, but they all work.
 
Thanks man, The Frustration has left. I might have solved it correctly but my work on the paper was everywhere and unorganized. You brought it out clearly with a method I was familiar with, only i did not use it hehe. Once again thank you.
 
Zeronem,
What method were you using?

Here’s one;
If you were allowed to use matrix operations to solve this (or want another way to check your answer with a calculator) you could rewrite it like this;

x + 2y = 5
3x +4z = 2
2y + 3w = -2
3z - 2w = 1

becomes;

0W + 1X + 2Y + 0Z = 5
0W + 3X + 0Y + 4Z = 2
3W + 0X + 2Y + 0Z = -2
-2W + 0X + 0Y + 3Z = 1

Which becomes;

0 1 2 0 * W = 5
0 3 0 4 * X = 2
3 0 2 0 * Y = -1
-2 0 0 3 * Z = 1

(sorry, I don't know how to put brackets into that)
Which is in the form of;

Ax = y, or if you prefer; Ax = C


...Where you can pre multiply both sides by the inverse of matrix A to solve for column vector x (the one with the W, X, Y, and Z);
x = A-1y

This would give the same answers Skeeter showed.
While it may look rather intimidating if you haven't learned about matrix operations, it is conceptually quite easy, just tedious in practice. However, for a modern calculator it is very fast and straightforward.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, i actually used to know the Augmented Matrix Method but I forgot it in time.
Here was the method I was useing.

x + 2y = 5
3x + 4z = 2
2y + 3w = -2
3z - 2w = 1

-3(x + 2y)=5(-3)---> -3x - 6y = -15 the 3 and -3 cancel.
3x + 4z = 2------> 3x + 4z = 2
= -6y + 4z = -13

Then i would take
2y + 3w = -2
3z - 2w = 1
make the w's cancel each other
2(2y + 3w) = -2(2) ------> 4y + 6w = -4
3(3z - 2w) = 1(3)--------> 9z - 6w = 3
= 4y + 9z = -1
.
Then we take -6y + 4z = -13 and 4y + 9z = -1
and cancel the y
2(-6y + 4z) = -13(2) -----------> -12y + 8z = -26
3(4y + 9z) = -1(3) -------------> 12y + 27z = -3
35z = -29
z = -29/35
This was the method I was using. I think I could of pulled it off if my work wasn't so unorganized on the paper I was using. I usually get completely careless in these problems when the Teacher teaches us stuff that is like kindergarden work for me.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top