Solving Ten-Pin Bowling Physics with Proportional Signs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the physics of a ten-pin bowling ball lofted at a specific velocity and angle, with an emphasis on how a 20% increase in mass affects its motion. The user successfully calculated the x and y components, maximum height, time of flight, and landing distance for the original mass but seeks clarification on how to mathematically represent the decrease in acceleration due to the increased mass. They apply Newton's second law, questioning if the new acceleration can be expressed as a(1-0.2) and how to derive the new initial velocity from this adjusted acceleration. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding proportional relationships in physics to solve real-world problems effectively. The user expresses gratitude for any assistance in completing their calculations.
moobs93
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i know this is really simple, but I'm not very good at working with proportional signs..

a novice ten-pin bowler, slightly "lofts" the ball (releases it too late and lifts it into the air so that it crashes to the ground. If the ball was released with a velocity of 3.5 m/s at an angle of 15 degrees above the horizontal, calculate:

a) the x and y components
b) the maximum height achieved by the ball
c) the time flight of the ball
d) how far down the lane the ball lands, measured from the release point
e) all of the above again, if the ball was 20% heavier

so i got the (a)-(d) taking the original mass as m. and started (e) by assuming the second mass would be (m+0.2m) and that the force applied by the bowler on the ball, would remain constant so the acceleration would change in proportion to the mass change of an additional 20%

my first question is; how do you represent the decrease in acceleration mathematically?
using F=ma, where m is now m(1+0.2)
my belly-flop attempt:
F=ma
a=K/m (where K is the constant force)
so mass is inversely proportional to the acceleration
does that mean the new acceleration is a(1-0.2) or am i completely off it?

and my second question is, how do you calculate the new initial velocity from the new acceleration? or rather, how do you calculate the time it takes to reach the maximum height (highest vertical displacement) using the new value for accleration? which i can then use to solve for the new initial velocity

once i have that i can finish the question myself
thanks heaps
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moobs93 said:
i know this is really simple, but I'm not very good at working with proportional signs..

a novice ten-pin bowler, slightly "lofts" the ball (releases it too late and lifts it into the air so that it crashes to the ground. If the ball was released with a velocity of 3.5 m/s at an angle of 15 degrees above the horizontal, calculate:

a) the x and y components
b) the maximum height achieved by the ball
c) the time flight of the ball
d) how far down the lane the ball lands, measured from the release point
e) all of the above again, if the ball was 20% heavier

so i got the (a)-(d) taking the original mass as m. and started (e) by assuming the second mass would be (m+0.2m) and that the force applied by the bowler on the ball, would remain constant so the acceleration would change in proportion to the mass change of an additional 20%

my first question is; how do you represent the decrease in acceleration mathematically?
using F=ma, where m is now m(1+0.2)
my belly-flop attempt:
F=ma
a=K/m (where K is the constant force)
so mass is inversely proportional to the acceleration
does that mean the new acceleration is a(1-0.2) or am i completely off it?

and my second question is, how do you calculate the new initial velocity from the new acceleration? or rather, how do you calculate the time it takes to reach the maximum height (highest vertical displacement) using the new value for accleration? which i can then use to solve for the new initial velocity

once i have that i can finish the question myself
thanks heaps

Welcome to physics forums.

I interpret the question to mean the same given initial conditions apply (3.5 m/s at 15° to the horizontal), and the ball is 20% heavier.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top