Solving the Capacitance Circuit: Time Constant & Charging Process

  • Thread starter Thread starter yikes_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ftl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time constant (τ) for a capacitor charging circuit and determining the charge on capacitor C2 over time. The user correctly identifies that τ can be found by multiplying the equivalent resistance (R(eq)) and equivalent capacitance (C(eq)). They express uncertainty about how changes in resistance and capacitance affect the charging speed, suggesting that lower capacitance may lead to faster charging. Additionally, there is a reminder to be cautious with series and parallel capacitance equations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding circuit configurations to solve for time constants and charge distributions effectively.
yikes_physics
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
capcitance again FTL :(

Homework Statement



All capacitors of the open circuit in Figure 3 are discharged at time t = 0, when the switch
S is turned on and capacitors starts to be charged. What is the time constant \tau of the charging process? What is the charge on capacitor C2 at an arbitrary time t > 0? If the resistances R1 and R2 are increased by a factor of 2, while capacitances C1 and C2 are decreased by a factor of 2, would the charging process occur faster or slower?


Homework Equations


Resistors in sereis = R1 + R2 +...
capacitors in series = C1 + C2 + ...
capacitors in parallel = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + ...
Voltage across a capacitor = V(o)e^-(delta t/\tau)
capacitor discharging = I(o)e^-(t/\tau) = Q(o)e^-(t/\tau)


The Attempt at a Solution


ok, bak with another one of these variable infested things, lol. First, i find R(eq) by adding the resistors in series and find Ceq by first combining the capacitors in series and then adding them in parallel. Now i have R(eq) and C(eq). Multiplying these together nets me \tau, correct?

if that's right, i then take \tau and place it in the equation V(o)e^-(delta t/\tau) where my voltage is half of C(eq). This is because both pieces of parallel capacitors get equal voltage.

As for the final part of the question, i would assume that the charge occurs faster due to the lower capacitance, but I am not sure by how much. since the resistors add in series, they simple become 2R(eq) while C(eq) goes up much more, or is this wrong to assume? any direction would be awesome.

ps. you guys are THE WIN...end of story
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be great if you could post your Figure 3.
 
doh! sry, i meant to put it as an attachment, but i guess my comp skills are down there with my physics ability, lol. here it is.
 

Attachments

Charge constant is given by RC, where R is the total resistance in the circuit and C is the total capacitance in the circuit.
For the second part, at any instant voltage across the parallel combination of capacitors is the same. Using charge distribution formula you can find the charge on C2.
For third part, again find the total resistance and capacitor in the circuit and hence find the time constant.
 
You switched the series/parallel capacitance equations, careful. I don't know if it was a typo or not, but I thought I would point that out.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top