Solving the Geodesic Equation: Raising Contravariant Indices

Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I would like to manipulate the geodesic equation.


Homework Equations


The geodesic equation is usually written as
k^{a}{}_{;b} k^{b}=\kappa k^{a} (it is important for my purpose to keep it in non-affine form).
It is clear that by contracting with the metric we may write alternatively
k_{a ;b} k^{b} = \kappa k_{a}.
What I would like to know is how to raise to a contravariant indices in the derivative on the left-hand side.

The Attempt at a Solution


If I had to guess, I would like to be able to write something like.
k^{a ;b} k_{b}=\kappa k^{a}.
Is this a valid form of the geodesic equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure. g^{a b} k_{;b}=k^{;a}.
 
Thank you for your reply Dick.
But how do you explain the lowering of the b index in the second factor on the left-hand side?
 
On the LHS you've got {k^a}_{;b}k^b=k^{a;c}g_{cb}k^b=k^{a;c}k_c=k^{a;b}k_b
 
Excellent! Thank you both very much.
 
Pacopag said:
Excellent! Thank you both very much.

The crucial point is that the covariant derivative transforms as a tensor, unlike say, the partial derivative.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top