Solving the Mystery Equation - Physics Library Wall

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The equation on the library wall represents the Lagrangian for quantum electrodynamics (QED). It includes terms for a fermion field, gauge covariant derivative, fermion mass, and the electromagnetic field strength tensor. Dimensional analysis reveals that the Lagrangian has a dimension of mass to the fourth power, while the other components have specific mass dimensions. Understanding this equation is crucial for grasping advanced concepts in physics. With continued study, the expression will become less intimidating over time.
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I saw this equation on one of the walls of my local physics library and I cannot make sense of it.

<br /> <br /> L = \bar {q} (i \gamma ^{\mu} D_{\mu} - m_{q} ) q - \frac {1}{4} F^{a}_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu} _{a} <br /> <br />

I tried assuming that L was the Lagrangian, m was mass, F was the Faraday tensor, etc. but my assumptions were never consistent with dimensional analysis.

What is this?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
q is a fermion field, L is the Lagrangian, gamma^u is the set of gamma matrices (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_matrices), D is the gauge covariant derivative (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_covariant_derivative), m is fermion mass, and F is the EM field strength tensor (or Faraday tensor) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor).

This is the Lagrangian for quantum electrodynamics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_electrodynamics).

For dimensional analysis: L has dimension of (mass^4), q has dimension (mass^3/2), D and m have dimension of mass, and F has dimension of (mass^2).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nicksauce said:
This is the Lagrangian for quantum electrodynamics.

Thanks, nicksauce. I still have so much to learn..
 
If you continue in physics, there will be a time when this expression does not look intimidating at all.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top