Solving the Mystery of 3D Mechanics: Is the Sum of Moments 0?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a rotating shaft with two strap-wheels of different diameters. Participants debate whether the sum of all moments at the center of the wheels is always zero, particularly when considering the angular rotation and net torque. It is clarified that since the shaft is in uniform circular motion, the assumption of zero net torque may not hold if the wheels can spin independently. The importance of understanding the relationship between the wheels and their diameters is emphasized, as it affects the lever arms and moments. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexity and depth of mechanical principles involved.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Femme_physics said:
Now does this mean that the sum of all moments on the center of perfect wheels is always 0?

Assuming the angular rotation of the wheel is zero, the the net torque is zero and the sum of the moments is zero.

Aren't A and C of different diameters? If so, the lever arms for T3 and T4 are different. That alters the diagram, but not the relationship.

It looks to me like you are treating the two wheels as one when seen in two dimensions. That would seem to assume that neither moves independently of the other. If they can spin freely the net moment need not be be zero.
 


Aren't A and C of different diameters? If so, the lever arms for T3 and T4 are different. That alters the diagram, but not the relationship.

You're right they're different diameters. It should be

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/8756/bebebebebe.jpg

Ignoring the length of the vectors

Assuming the angular rotation of the wheel is zero, the the net torque is zero and the sum of the moments is zero.

I wasn't told anything about the angular rotation of the wheel. Actually, let me just write the question
"Shaft AD is supported by bearing D and B (the bearings don't have any pivotal forces) On the shaft are strap-wheels A and C. On the straps are acting forces as described in the drawing. The shaft is at uniform circular motion..
Given: Radius of wheel A is 50mm and radius of wheel C is 40mm"

Nothing about "angular rotation"

It looks to me like you are treating the two wheels as one when seen in two dimensions. That would seem to assume that neither moves independently of the other. If they can spin freely the net moment need not be be zero.

I see what you mean. But based on the question my assumption was correct, right? Since they're both attached to the same rotating shaft.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


There must be more to this question than you have let on?
 


Femme_physics said:
I wasn't told anything about the angular rotation of the wheel. Actually, let me just write the question
"Shaft AD is supported by bearing D and B (the bearings don't have any pivotal forces) On the shaft are strap-wheels A and C. On the straps are acting forces as described in the drawing. The shaft is at uniform circular motion..
Given: Radius of wheel A is 50mm and radius of wheel C is 40mm"

Nothing about "angular rotation"
You are told that the shaft undergoes uniform circular motion.
 


There must be more to this question than you have let on?

Yes posted just before you posted :)

You are told that the shaft undergoes uniform circular motion.

Ah, so that's the key! :) I see now! The principles of mechanics are seemingly infinite and interesting!

Thanks Doc, Fewmet, Studiot!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top