Solving the Mystery of the Pigeon-Seeking Fall: Acceleration Calculations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration experienced by a person who falls 44.6 meters and lands on a garbage can, crushing it by 0.422 meters. The initial calculations involve using gravitational acceleration and kinematic equations for free fall. Participants suggest applying conservation of energy principles, where gravitational potential energy is converted into work done on the can. There is a debate about whether the original size of the garbage can is necessary for calculating the work, with some arguing it is not needed since the depth of the crush is provided. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding energy conservation in solving the problem.
GuitarHero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A very silly person, intent on catching pigeons on the roof of an apartment building, trips and falls a distance of 44.6 m. She lands on a metal garbage can, crushing it to a depth of 0.422 m and walks away without having been seriously hurt. What acceleration did she experience during the collision?


Homework Equations


(see solution attempt)
and
d=v1t+1/2at2


The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I have so far for the first part of the problem (her acceleration, velocity, and position when she is free falling for 44.6m):
a=-9.81
v=-9.81t
d=-4.905t2+44.6

But I'm not sure how to factor in the acceleration of her crushing the garbage can...

Any help would be awesome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of energy would be better for this problem

Her gravitational pe is converted into the work done in crushing the can to the depth of 0.422m
 
rock.freak667 said:
Conservation of energy would be better for this problem

Her gravitational pe is converted into the work done in crushing the can to the depth of 0.422m

But wouldn't I need to know the original size of the garbage can to calculate the work required to crush it?
 
GuitarHero said:
But wouldn't I need to know the original size of the garbage can to calculate the work required to crush it?

I don't think you would, the can is crushed to that depth d, so W=Fd.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top