Solving the Pendulum Equation: L, T, pi & g

  • Thread starter Thread starter pkpiotr517
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Pi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the pendulum equation for g in terms of L, T, and π. The original equation is T = 2π√(L/g). The user attempts to isolate g by manipulating the equation, ultimately arriving at (T/(2π))^2 = L/g. Feedback confirms that inverting both sides leads to g = (2π/T)^2 * L, which is the correct form. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper algebraic manipulation to achieve the desired equation.
pkpiotr517
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is one question that's giving me a bit of trouble to handle.
The Period of a pendulum is given by the following equation:
e0ce071038f4bfa4bf458a2758ca9564.png

where T= period of pendulum (seconds)
L= Length of pendulum (meters)
g= acceleration doe to gravity (meters per second2)

Solve this equation in terms of L, T and pi. That means that g sould be by itself on one side of the equal sign and a combination of L, T, and pi should be on the other side of the equal sign.




T=2(pi)*square.root.of(L/g)



My attempt at the problem was:
(T)/(2*pi)= square.root.of(L/g)2
Then I squared the right side of the equation and did the same on the left in order to cancel out the square root on the right.
((T)/(2*pi))2=(L/g)
Afterwords, I tried to factor out the L by multiplying its inverse on the right and got:
((T)/(2*pi))2(1/L)=(1/g)

There I get stuck, because I'm not too sure if he wanted it set equal to 1/g. So if anyone can send some feedback, then it would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From here

\left( \frac{T}{2 \pi}\right)^2= \frac{L}{g}


You can just invert both sides of the equation and then multiply by L.

Or as you've done in the last line of your working, just invert both sides and you'll have 'g' in terms 'L' and 'T' and 'π'
 
So I would get:

\left( \frac{2 \pi }{T }\right)^2 (L)= {g}

Is that correct?
 
Last edited:
Yes that looks correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
908
Replies
3
Views
907
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top