Solving the Pigeonhole Principle Homework Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kreizhn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The following is the question verbatim:

Imagine a set of 10 objects, each of which is painted one of 3 possible colors. Show that there exists 2 disjoint subsets of this set such that each subset consists of 3 objects all painted the same color.

The Attempt at a Solution



This is a problem that is supposed to demonstrate the pigeonhole principle. I know how to use said pigeonhole principle, so maybe it's just the wording that is confusing me.

Trivially, if I am allowed to choose among all possible sets of ten objects consisting of 3 colors (say r,g,b) then of course I can construct two disjoint sets each of which contain at least three objects of the same color. If the set is {r1 r2 r3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8 g9 g10} then obviously {r1 r2 r3}, {g4, ..., g10} works. Of course there are many others.

On the same hand we're not guaranteed that in any decomposition of the set there are two disjoint sets containing at least three. For example {r1 r2 g3 g4 b5 b6 b7 b8 b9 b10} could be decomposed as say {r1 r2 g3 g4} {b5, ... b10}.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question? Could someone clear this up for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I figured it out. For some reason I thought the colours had to be distinct also.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Back
Top